Talk:Helatrobus

This Helatrobus article would be best merged with the Space opera in Scientology Scripture article. Taken out of context it inspires little other than "WTF?"

S. M. Sullivan 03:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

:Space opera in Scientology Scripture no longer exists, so i removed the merge template. Foobaz·o< 12:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

If it must be merged, then it should be merged back to its parent article Space opera in Scientology scripture which exists, again.

User:A. Non 17 March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.53.66 (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

• against Space opera in Scientology scripture is long enough already. To avoid bloating that article, this article should remain separate. -Neitherday (talk) 01:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:: Wrote this before noticing there is a more recent discussion taking place here. -Neitherday (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Again, I'd like to see Helatrobus merged with Space opera in Scientology scripture. It just isn't notable enough to merit its own article. One second thought, maybe it should be deleted.S. M. Sullivan (talk) 07:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

The article states: "currently accepted age of the Universe as 13.8 billion years". Since when is this current? And accepted by who? There are many theories as to the age of the universe, some older, some younger, none of which can be scientifically proven. The article does not cite a source for this information either. Unless something can be done to either site a true scientific source/consensus, this sentence should be rewritten. 173.209.109.55 (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)