Talk:Hillary Clinton#rfc F5B5451
{{Talk header}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{American English}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=05:18, 9 May 2007
|action1link=Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/Archive GA
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=129415072
|action2=GAR
|action2date=18:30, 14 May 2007
|action2link=Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 18#Hillary Rodham Clinton
|action2result=delisted
|action2oldid=130530179
|action3=GAN
|action3date=13:01, 7 June 2007
|action3link=
|action3result=listed
|action3oldid=136430102
|action4=FAC
|action4date=01:32, 14 October 2007
|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hillary Rodham Clinton/archive1
|action4result=not promoted
|action4oldid=164347182
|action5=GAR
|action5date=01:39, 21 January 2008
|action5link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hillary Rodham Clinton/1
|action5result=kept
|action5oldid=185669237
|action6=GAR
|action6date=23:33, 28 February 2008
|action6link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hillary Rodham Clinton/2
|action6result=kept
|action6oldid=194752539
|action7=FAC
|action7date=01:37, 27 May 2008
|action7link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hillary Rodham Clinton/archive2
|action7result=not promoted
|action7oldid=215108649
|action8=GAR
|action8date=03:44, 18 May 2009
|action8link=Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/GA1
|action8result=keep
|action8oldid=290528862
|action9 = GAR
|action9date = 16:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|action9link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hillary Rodham Clinton/3
|action9result = kept
|action9oldid = 294198340
|action10=FAC
|action10date=2014-12-13
|action10link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hillary Rodham Clinton/archive3
|action10result=promoted
|action10oldid=637844292
|action11 = FAR
|action11date = 2022-09-24
|action11link = Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hillary Clinton/archive1
|action11result = demoted
|action11oldid = 1110147019
|currentstatus=FFA
|topic=Socsci
|maindate=August 21, 2019
|otd1date=2015-11-07|otd1oldid=689159947
|otd2date=2018-11-07|otd2oldid=867479640
|otd3date=2020-11-07|otd3oldid=987546181
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|listas=Clinton, Hillary Rodham|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=Top }}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=Mid|subject=person}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid |American=yes |American-importance=top}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=High|AR=yes|AR-importance=High|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=Top|Cape-Cod=yes|Cape-Cod-importance=Mid|USGov=yes|USGov-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject United States Presidents |trump=yes |trump-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=high}}
| blp=yes
}}
{{Press|collapsed=yes
| title = Wiki Woman
| author = Eve Fairbanks
| date = 2008-04-09
| url = http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=4f0c6aa3-3028-4ca4-a3b9-a053716ee53d&p=1
| org = The New Republic
| section = April
| title2 = 'Round the Clock: Obama, Clinton Wiki-Warfare
| author2 = Alison Stewart, Rachel Martin
| date2 = 2008-04-03
| url2 = http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89333759&sc=emaf
| org2 = The Bryant Park Project, NPR
| title3 = Editors in Chief
| author3 = Brooke Gladstone
| date3 = 2008-04-04
| url3 = http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/04/04/02
| org3 = On The Media, NPR
| title4= Liberal Web
| author4 = John J. Miller
| date4= 2008-04-21
| url4=http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=YWM4Nzc3ODk3NDQxYWYyMjMzZjQ3NzEzM2JkMzM1OTk=
| org4= National Review
| section4=April 2008
| title5=
| author5 = Pascal Harter
| date5= 2008-04-08
| url5=
| org5= The World Today, BBC World Service
| title6= Hillary's Wiki Defender
| author6 = Jesse Brown
| date6= 2008-04-10
| url6=http://www.cbc.ca/searchengine/blog/2008/04/this_weeks_show_april_1008.html
| org6= Search Engine, CBC Radio One
| title7= Wikipedia Wars
| author7 = Tom Foreman
| date7= 2008-04-12
| url7= http://www.charter.net/video/?vendid=35&vid=142269
| org7= This Week..., CNN
| title8=
| author8=
| url8=
| date8= 2008-05-07
| org8= Jeopardy!
| title9= Clinton's entry in Wikipedia has a watchdog
| author9 = Kelly Heyboer
| date9= 2008-05-28
| url9= http://blog.nj.com/digitallife/2008/05/hillary_clintons_wikipedia_wat.html
| org9= The Star-Ledger
| title10=one of two pieces aired
| author10 = Paul Murnane
| date10= 2008-05-28
| url10=http://www.wcbs880.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=2400703
| org10= WCBS Newsradio 880
| title11= Meet the guy who has protected Hillary Clinton's Wikipedia page for almost a decade
| author11 = Maxwell Tani
| date11= 2015-05-15
| url11= http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-hillary-clintons-wikipedia-editor-2015-5
| org11= Business Insider
| title12= The ladies who love Hillary
| author12= Elspeth Reeve
| date12= June 13, 2015
| url12= http://www.newrepublic.com/article/122032/ladies-who-love-hillary-clinton
| org12= The New Republic
| title13=Wikipedia Wars Over Clinton As Presumptive Nominee
| author13=Roudman, Sam
| date13=June 7, 2016
| url13=http://www.vocativ.com/326579/wikipedia-wars-over-clinton-as-presumptive-nominee/
| org13=Vocativ
| title14=Hacker posts porn on Hillary Clinton’s Wikipedia page
| author14=Wagner, Meg
| date14=October 13, 2016
| url14=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hacker-posts-porn-hillary-clinton-wikipedia-page-article-1.2829414
| org14=New York Daily News
| title15=The most challenging job of the 2016 race: Editing the candidates’ Wikipedia pages
| org15=The Washington Post
| url15=https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/presidential-wikipedias
| date15=October 27, 2016
| author15=Alcantara, Chris
}}
{{Copied |from=Hillary Clinton |from_oldid=1121570943 |to=Legal career of Hillary Clinton |date= |afd= |merge= |diff= |to_diff=1121553078 |to_oldid= }}
{{American politics AE|1RR=no|Consensus required=no|BRD=yes}}
{{Old moves
|title1=Hillary Rodham Clinton|title2=Hillary Clinton
|oldlist=
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Not moved, 7 February 2006
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 12 February 2007
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move (malformed move request, non-admin closure), closed 21 December 2007
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 18 June 2011
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 20 November 2012
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved to Hillary Clinton (non-admin closure), closed 18 June 2013
:*MR, Closure as move of Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved back to Hillary Rodham Clinton (no clear consensus for the previous move), closed 28 June 2013
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Speedy close as no consensus (non-admin closure), closed 24 February 2014
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move (admin panel closure), closed 21 April 2014
:*MR, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus, default to endorse, and procedural restrictions established: No further move request to be started until February 2015, and between February 2015 and February 2017, or the closure of the next valid move request, whichever is earlier, no move request to be made unless at least 5,000 characters in length, closed 31 May 2014
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Secretary Clinton, Speedy close since another RM open (non-admin closure), closed 17 April 2014
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary (politician), Speedy close as unlikely and potentially disruptive (non-admin closure, rapidly endorsed by admin), closed 27 April 2014
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Summarily closed citing prior declaration that if an RM is submitted prior to February 2017 it must be at least 5,000 characters in length (non-admin closure), closed 9 April 2015
|list=
- RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved (panel closure), closed 8 May 2015, decision posted 11 June 2015
}}
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes|
{{Annual readership|scale=log}}
{{Annual report|2016|17,801,991}}
{{Top 25 Report|Apr 19 2015 (15th)|Jun 5 2016 (19th)|Jul 24 2016 (1st)|Sep 11 2016 (20th)|Sep 25 2016 (5th)|Oct 2 2016 (19th)|Oct 9 2016 (3rd)|Oct 16 2016 (6th)|Oct 23 2016 (18th)|Oct 30 2016 (18th)|Nov 6 2016 (6th)}}
{{Section sizes}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Tan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 50
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Hillary Clinton/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Hillary Clinton/Archive index
|mask=Talk:Hillary Clinton/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
__TOC__
Main image
The main image of Clinton should be her official portrait as secretary of state, as it is with every other politician including her husband. 2600:1011:B346:16E4:E92F:2BAC:2FD6:884C (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
:That's not the case with John Kerry. I don't know whether there is any policy stating that a politician's Wikipedia image needs to be an official portrait. That's probably a best practice in many cases, but Hillary Clinton may or may not be best known for being a Secretary of State. She's known for many other things, and her official Secretary of State portrait is about 12 years old now. So there can be an argument to use a more recent image. I don't really care either way, just saying that "should be" is a bit strong. Kerdooskistalk 20:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
::This has been hashed out many times for this article - search the talk page archives. As far as I am aware it is not a policy, just a convention that often makes sense, but in this case I think not. Tvoz/talk 05:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
:I agree. At the very least it should be reverted back to the 2016 image. I would consider this 2024 one a significant downgrade in quality. TheBritinator (talk) 02:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
:Agree. This is a bad image and should be reverted to the 2016 image or her official portrait as secretary of state. Rochambeau1783 (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
I reverted to the 2016 image that had been stable and reinstated the editor's note asking that consensus be reached before making changes . That note should not have been removed as it is an ongoing request. Tvoz/talk 19:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
:For the best. TheBritinator (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)