Talk:History (journal)
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1=
{{WikiProject Academic Journals }}
}}
Wikipedia *cited* in ''History''
Review controversy section
They published a review and somebody wrote a letter giving a different view – this sounds pretty much like how journals regularly function, rather than something worth mentioning in reference to one specific book. Is there any reason for its prominence here, beyond giving prominence to the names of those involved? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 14:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)