Talk:History of serfdom
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject History|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Sociology |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Agriculture |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=mid |ethics=yes}}
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Organized Labour |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject European history |importance=mid}}
}}
Abolition in England and Wales
The article states: 'In England, the end of serfdom began with the Peasants' Revolt in 1381. It had largely died out in England by 1500 as a personal status, and was fully ended when Elizabeth I freed the last remaining serfs in 1574.[5]' However, if one goes to the source given and reads it carefully, it emerges that in 1574 Elizabeth I freed the remaining serfs on her own estates, not generally or without exception in England and Wales. These are two different things. Norvo (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Russia
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of serfdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527113728/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Serfdom to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Serfdom
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Fictional work used as source
Citation 6, "Le Roi de Fer" by Maurice Druon is a work of fiction. It is historical fiction, but it does not provide evidence that "Serfdom was de facto ended in France by Philip IV, Louis X (1315), and Philip V (1318)"
Heyday section
Am I alone in finding the section title "Heyday" a bit unserious? It's a term associated with phenomena far less serious and less brutal than a form of slavery. I would suggest "Prevalence" or "Zenith", or perhaps the historical era with which the section is concerned? Just a thought. Matuko (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
:I agree. I'll retitle as "Prevalence" unless you have another idea for it :•) — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚) 21:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Inadequate Lead?
The lead doesn't summarize the contents of the article, is unnecessarily short, and doesn't follow MOS guidelines for lead section. I would appreciate if someone could expand the lead section from just a few words. — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚) 21:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)