Talk:Inclusive design#Merge proposal

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

{{WikiProject Accessibility}}

{{WikiProject Architecture |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Disability}}

{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Industrial design|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Urban studies and planning|importance=Low}}

}}

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Northwestern_University/Online_communities_and_crowds_(Winter) | assignments = ElmerB23, AlphaBetta, HYang2024 | reviewers = Charlottespohler, MollyPribble, Carlikelley | start_date = 2022-01-03 | end_date = 2022-03-18 }}

The language of the article needs to be de-jargonised. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:39, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Inclusive vs Universal design

I don't think that inclusive design and universal design are the same. Where inclusive design is seen as a method for designing one solution for one individual (usually for someone that has special needs). Design for All or Universal Design takes into account a wide variety of needs so that everyone (with whatever ability can use it). Inclusive design is popular in the field of UX/interaction design, to make digital interfaces more accessible for specific user needs; usually, by solving someone's needs really good, it is easier to use for everyone. https://www.fastcompany.com/90243282/the-no-1-thing-youre-getting-wrong-about-inclusive-design

Design for all is more an attribute mostly used in construction and infrastructure. You could use inclusive design methods to reach to a better Universal Design. 2A01:110:8012:1012:187D:F390:8655:CED9 (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)