Talk:India and weapons of mass destruction
{{talk header |search=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 2
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:India and weapons of mass destruction/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject History of Science |importance=mid }}
{{WikiProject Military history |class=B |Indian=yes |Weaponry=yes |B-Class-1=yes|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes }}
{{WikiProject India|importance=top }}
}}
{{Indian English}}
{{old move|date=6 December 2023|destination=India and nuclear weapons|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1191136830#Requested move 6 December 2023}}
Untitled
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (
Hopelessly one-sided about India's (lack of) capacity to produce a two-stage thermonuclear weapon
Carnegie (reliable source) quotes: "late in 2009, a group of senior Indian nuclear scientists, including many who were actively involved in the weapons program, called upon their government to conduct an “in-depth analysis of our real capabilities,” given “the grave situation we are in regarding our Thermonuclear (H-bomb) capability,” with an eye to undertaking “resolute, speedy and comprehensive corrective action.”":
https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/07/18/india-pub-87397
Theeurocrat (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:France and weapons of mass destruction which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)