Talk:Invariant (mathematics)

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Mathematics| importance = high}}

}}

{{Copied

|from =Invariant (computer science)

|from_oldid =856727036

|to =Invariant (mathematics)

|to_diff =865700349

|to_oldid =865691565

|date =16:04, 25 October 2018

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(365d)

| archive = Talk:Invariant (mathematics)/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 1

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 3

}}

{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}

Invariant or closed

I think that the definition of an invariant set is not correct. If I am not mistaken, a set S is invariant under a map T if a\in S\Leftrightarrow T(a)\in S. In particular, if T is a bijection (which is the typical case where this terminology is used), this means that S=T(S), i.e. S is a fixed element of the action of T in the power set. I think the current definition corresponds to "closed": a set S is closed under T if T(S)\subseteq S. Another common terminology is "fixed". A set S is (pointwise) fixed by T if T(a)=a for all a\in S, and setwise fixed if T(S)=S. So setwise fixed is a synonym for invariant (if T is a bijection). However, these terms are sometimes confused: a good example is pointwise invariant and setwise invariant instead of pointwise fixed and setwise fixed. As mentioned above, another common term is "stable", which I believe is also a synonym for "invariant", and not for "closed". In any case, it might be good to find references to the different uses. arf