Talk:Invariant (mathematics)
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Mathematics| importance = high}}
}}
{{Copied
|from =Invariant (computer science)
|from_oldid =856727036
|to =Invariant (mathematics)
|to_diff =865700349
|to_oldid =865691565
|date =16:04, 25 October 2018
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(365d)
| archive = Talk:Invariant (mathematics)/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 3
}}
{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}
Invariant or closed
I think that the definition of an invariant set is not correct. If I am not mistaken, a set is invariant under a map if . In particular, if is a bijection (which is the typical case where this terminology is used), this means that , i.e. is a fixed element of the action of in the power set. I think the current definition corresponds to "closed": a set is closed under if . Another common terminology is "fixed". A set is (pointwise) fixed by if for all , and setwise fixed if . So setwise fixed is a synonym for invariant (if is a bijection). However, these terms are sometimes confused: a good example is pointwise invariant and setwise invariant instead of pointwise fixed and setwise fixed. As mentioned above, another common term is "stable", which I believe is also a synonym for "invariant", and not for "closed". In any case, it might be good to find references to the different uses. arf