Talk:Inverted binocular phenomenon
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Low}}
}}
Too short and lonely
This article is too short, has very few citatations and is not well categorized. I also think that is relies too heavily on a single source. As it has been tagged with template, this article is an orphan. So I request editors to elaborate this article and add links to other articles in Wikipedia. Experts are always welcome to take a closer look and contribute, if possible. Roshu Bangal (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Nobody's ever called this "inverted binocular phenomenon"
No sources call it that. There are at most two sources that talk about this, one that talks about the first. This might be at most a few sentences on a page about phantom limbs or something, not a full article. Ldan JustARandomSquid (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
:Got to agree. A single primary-source paper followed by a regurgitation in Scientific American looks questionable evidence that the topic meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 09:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)