Talk:Irene Angelico

{{u|Ireneangelico}} you have been contributing to this article and have added substantial content today. As mentioned at the top of this talk page, users with a conflict of interest are advised not to directly edit the article. I did not see the response to {{u|Theroadislong}}'s COI notification on your talk page (User talk:Ireneangelico#Paid editing?), so your COI-editing status is not clear. Jay (talk) 02:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

:Also {{u|ThatMontrealIP}}'s comment on your talk page (User talk:Ireneangelico#Draft:Irene Lilienheim Angelico). Jay (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

:Hi Jay, Thank you for reading my old submission Abbey Jack Neidik. I have stated afresh without all the peacock terms, and submitted again today, although the basic facts included in the article are the same. I have not been paid to write this, but I mm the partner/wife of Abbey Neidik, which puts me in a good position to write bout his work. As such, do i still need to make a disclosure? And if so, i would like the help as you offered. Ireneangelico (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

::I know it has been months, but yes you do need to make a disclosure. See WP:COI and WP:COIEDIT for how to make an edit request. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 17:57, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

See the page history. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

:See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ireneangelico - someone removed the COI template from the page (I reverted it back). Gommeh (talk/contribs) 17:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

::@GommehGaming101 The user who removed the template has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PhilUnger&diff=prev&oldid=1286111181 said] that they are acquaintances but that their relationship does not cross the line into a COI. I cannot speculate if this is accurate. Vegantics (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:::They need to make sure they read WP:COI then. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 19:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)