Talk:J. T. Edson#rfc 6EA7479

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Edson, J. T.|blp=no|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|needs-infobox=yes}}

{{WikiProject England|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Literature|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Westerns|importance=High}}

}}

Missing Bibliography

I am inquiring what has happened to the list of books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.241.52 (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

:This has been restored. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

RfC about the section "Female fight fetish"

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1649887271}}

I feel that the "Female fight fetish" section is a violation of Wikipedia:No original research. It doesn't cite any sources, and it seems to be implying that J. T. Edson was a sexual pervert or something. 192.107.137.243 (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

:Please see WP:RFC. This isn't a proper RfC because (1) there have been no previous discussion attempts about the content and (2) the RfC lacks a neutral statement/question. That said, I agree that the section on female fights is unsourced analysis and WP:OR, and the section heading is non-neutral. The content should not be restored without a reliable source that supports the claims. Schazjmd (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

::Agree with the IP and {{u|Schazjmd}}. This entire section was egregious WP:OR and should not be restored under any circumstances. The rest of the article is also largely unsourced and could stand drastic trimming. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Comment {{sbb}} Agree with others about the 'fetish' section. Some of the material that remains, including "JT's political beliefs" in 1980s and some plot summaries seem similarly WP:OR and over-heated.Pincrete (talk) 08:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)