Talk:Jake Hager/GA1

{{al|{{#titleparts:Jack Swagger/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Jack Swagger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk) 05:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{#if:|

---

{{{overcom}}}|}}

1. Is it reasonably well written?
2. :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}}
3. :: {{#if:|{{{1acom}}}|}}
4. :B. MoS compliance: {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}}
5. :: {{#if:|{{{1bcom}}}|}}
6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
7. :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|{{{2a}}}}}
8. :: {{#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}
9. :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|{{{2b}}}}}
10. :: {{#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}
11. :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|{{{2c}}}}}
12. :: {{#if:|{{{2ccom}}}|}}
13. Is it broad in its coverage?
14. :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|{{{3a}}}}}
15. :: {{#if:|{{{3acom}}}|}}
16. :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|{{{3b}}}}}
17. :: {{#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}
18. Is it neutral?
19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|{{{4}}}}}
20. :: {{#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
21. Is it stable?
22. : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|{{{5}}}}}
23. :: {{#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
25. :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|{{{6a}}}}}
26. :: {{#if:|{{{6acom}}}|}}
27. :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|{{{6b}}}}}
28. :: {{#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}
29. Overall:
30. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|{{{7}}}}}
31. :: {{#if:|{{{7com}}}|}}