Talk:Japanese Spitz

{{Talk header|search=y}}

{{Article history

| action1 = GAN

| action1date = 5 September 2007

| action1link = Talk:Japanese Spitz#GA review

| action1result = listed

| action1oldid = 155563156

| action2 = GAR

| action2date = 11:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

| action2link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Japanese Spitz/1

| action2result = delisted

| action2oldid = 430309419

| currentstatus = DGA

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|1=

{{WikiProject Dogs|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Japan|importance=mid}}

}}

{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Japanese Spitz/1}}

Bad Source

Source number six, the breed standard, is cited in the explanation of the history of the breed. I am trying to figure out why, as it does not appear to explain much about the history of the breed, never mind the specific facts it's being cited for. I wanted to send out a notice quickly to see if someone could explain it to me, but if there is neither explanation nor action to remedy the situation, then I plan to remove it and insert citations where I can and citation needed tags where I can't. Reinana kyuu (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)