Login
Login

Talk:Jon Cooper

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes |class=C|listas=Cooper, Jon|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low }}

{{WikiProject Ice Hockey|bio=yes}}

{{WikiProject Canada|sport=yes|bc=yes|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject United States}}

}}

{{old move|date=March 26, 2013|destination=Jon Cooper|result=no consensus|link=Talk:Jon Cooper (ice hockey)#Requested move}}

Comments

This should be the default Jon Cooper page. NHL head coach is much more notable than NFL player who played a few games. 205.156.36.1 (talk)

13:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Redirected this page to the Jon Cooper page. Scp333 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus at this time. I agree that it's too soon to ascertain which of the Jon/Jonathan Coopers will become the primary topic, so status quo for now. Miniapolis 14:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

----

:Jon Cooper (ice hockey) → {{no redirect|Jon Cooper}} – He is now an NHL Head Coach, much more notable than the other Jon Cooper who is a former NFL player who only played a few games. Scp333 (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Support. A simple hat note can direct to Jon Cooper (American football) and I see no evidence of the upcoming American football prospect Jonathan Cooper being called "Jon" so a disam page doesn't seem like a huge necessity, in my opinion. Even if the disam is kept, still agree with the move. Ravendrop 02:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak SupportNeutral I'm fine with either of the current dab system, or the dab system being proposed here. Canuck89 (what's up?) 08:02, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral With there being three articles with similar names I would lean towards leaving it as is with an eye towards reviewing it in a couple years if he has been a successful NHL coach and search results indicate its the primary topic. Right now I wouldn't think it is much more primary than a two year NFL player. And with most people shortening the name Jonathan to Jon even if the player doesn't I think all the topics as it stands are probably equally notable so a disambig page is the best option probably. -DJSasso (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Ice Hockey articles

Requested move 4 June 2025

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: pages move per consensus on the alternate proposal below. Andrewa (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

----

– Highly-accomplished NHL head coach with a long tenure, likely headed for the Hall of Fame, versus a football player with a brief NFL career and various college coaching (non-HC) jobs. [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-06&end=2025-05&pages=Jon_Cooper_(ice_hockey){{!}}Jon_Cooper_(American_football) Pageviews] indicate the hockey coach is the primary topic to readers, with the NHL coach receiving hundreds per day/thousands per month versus the football player receiving single-digits per day/a few hundred per month. The Kip (contribs) 17:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.