Talk:Josette Simon#Date of Birth
{{Article history
|action1 = GAN
|action1date = 12:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
|action1link = Talk:Josette Simon/GA1
|action1result = listed
|action1oldid = 1109013906
|action2 = PR
|action2date = 23 May 2023
|action2link = Wikipedia:Peer_review/Josette Simon/archive1
|action2result = reviewed
|action2oldid = 1156459089
|action3 = FAC
|action3date = 2023-07-11
|action3link = Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Josette Simon/archive1
|action3result = promoted
|action3oldid = 1164806939
|currentstatus = FA
|maindate=January 14, 2025
|dykdate = 5 October 2022
|dykentry = ... that when Josette Simon appeared as Rosaline in Love's Labour's Lost, she was the first black woman in a lead role at the Royal Shakespeare Company?
|dyknom = Template:Did you know nominations/Josette Simon
|topic = Media and drama
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=FA|listas=Simon, Josette|blp=yes|
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=low}}
{{WikiProject Shakespeare|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Theatre |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Connected contributor|User1=TomDale90|U1-declared=yes}}
{{Photograph requested}}
{{Talk:Josette Simon/GA1}}
Did you know nomination
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Josette Simon}}
Date of Birth
Free BMD has a Josette P Simon born in Leicester in the 2nd quarter of 1959. Is that the subject of this article ? RGCorris (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
:Even if it is we should not be using primary sources. I'm not clear what the problem was with the source for her date of birth that was just removed -- it was a reliable source that said she was 16 in February 1976, so she was born in about 1959. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
::{{u|JeffUK}}, I see you have a source for 1960 as the year of birth, but it would be a remarkable coincidence if the above BMD record is wrong. That record is the only Josette Simon to come up in FreeBMD, and it is from Leicester. Perhaps we should go back to just "c. 1959", which doesn't contradict your source directly? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
:::There are two books, one published by the RSC (who employed Josette) stating 1960 as the birth year. She may have been born with another name (i.e. Josette may be a middle name, or stage name.) Also note that the entry on FreeBMD does not correctly link back to a source document. ("The page number is not within the range expected for the district. Note that there a number of possible reasons for this, including an error in the district, the page, the volume, the date or the type of entry. Further information may also be available") as theres doubt as to the accuracy of the transposition (and freebmd is transposed by volunteers) I'm minded to discard it for now. JeffUK 13:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
::::OK, that's reasonable. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Still, it seems very un-encyclopedic for a featured article about a living person to have neither a photograph nor even a birth year, let alone a date. If the subject was a 17th century pirate or an ancient queen, uncertainty would be understandable, but this situation seems rather shady. Minturn (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:What nonsense. We reflect the sources, and if the sources show two possible years, we show two possible years. As to having no photograph: there are policy requirements about the sourcing of photographs and if there are no non-free ones available, we are unable to post any - that's what our own policies say. There's nothing "shady" about it at all. - SchroCat (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Personal life
"Simon visits patients, with her dog Milo, through the charity Pets As Therapy,{{cite web |first=Cheslyn |last=Baker |title=An Interview with Netflix star Josette Simon OBE |url=https://pukaarmagazine.co.uk/interview-josette-simon-obe/ |website=Pukaar Magazine |date=29 May 2020 |access-date=17 May 2022 |archive-date=20 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210620120748/https://pukaarmagazine.co.uk/interview-josette-simon-obe/ |url-status=live }} and supports the Kaos Signing Choir for Deaf and Hearing Children.{{cite web|title=The Choir|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00qztjp|publisher=BBC|access-date=26 May 2022|archive-date=24 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220524103312/https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00qztjp|url-status=live}}{{cite web |title=About |url=https://www.thekaosorganisation.com/about |publisher=The Kaos Organisation |accessdate=30 July 2012 |archive-date=10 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130710112357/http://www.thekaosorganisation.com/about/ |url-status=live }} She is a patron of Action Deafness,{{cite web |title=Meet the Patrons |url=https://actiondeafness.org.uk/about-us/who-are-we/patrons/ |website=Action Deafness |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=9 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210509112543/https://actiondeafness.org.uk/about-us/who-are-we/patrons/ |url-status=live }} the Life and Deaf Association,{{cite web |title=Josette Simon OBE is Life & Deaf Patron |url=http://www.lifeanddeaf.co.uk/josette-simon-obe-is-life-deaf-patron/ |website=Life and Deaf Association |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=29 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210929034617/http://www.lifeanddeaf.co.uk/josette-simon-obe-is-life-deaf-patron/ |url-status=live }} the Deaf Ethnic Women's Association,{{cite web |title=Board, Trustees and Staff |url=https://www.dewa.org.uk/team |website=Deaf Ethnic Women's Association |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=23 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623092732/https://www.dewa.org.uk/team |url-status=live }} and Safety Curtain.{{cite web |title=Our Patrons |url=https://www.safetycurtain.org.uk/our-patrons |website=Safety Curtain |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=17 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210717151118/https://www.safetycurtain.org.uk/our-patrons |url-status=live }}"
{{reftalk}}
Sources with more independence would be a good thing here, as-is, it comes across a a bit promo-ish. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
:The article has been amended. Regards,BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Question
{{ping|BennyOnTheLoose}} is there a reason the article uses "actor" instead of actress when the subject is a female? 750h+ 17:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|750h+}} the term actress is sometimes seen as outdated or offensive. See [https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2011/sep/25/readers-editor-actor-or-actress this Guardian article] and [https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/actor-vs-actress-76531/ this Backstage article]. Sources referring to Simon as an "actor" include The Guardian ([https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/apr/02/josette-simon-if-i-wasnt-me-id-like-to-be-prime-minister], What's On Stage ([https://www.whatsonstage.com/news/josette-simon-i-dont-like-labels-youre-not-a-tv-actor-or-a-theatre-actor_45304/]), 'British Black and Asian Shakespeare Database' ([https://bbashakespeare.warwick.ac.uk/people/josette-simon]), Singh's Shakespeare and Postcolonial Theory, the Financial Times ([https://www.ft.com/content/48d310d0-fe17-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30]) and more. There are also sources that refer to her as an actress. In Iyengar's Colorblind Shakespeare: New Perspectives on Race and Performance, Simon is referred to as both "actress" and "actor" on the same page. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
::I think it should be "actress", which reflects widespread usage across the encyclopedia. Using "actor" here almost certainly more often raises questions in the mind of the reader instead of avoiding their offense. — Goszei (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Actor is a common enough gender neutral term that is widely accepted, and is in line with MOS guidelines too. - SchroCat (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Photograph?
Congratulations, BennyOnTheLoose. This is brilliant work. Have you tried to procure a photograph of Simon? There are plenty online. I think that [https://www.flickr.com/photos/steve-ellwood/albums/72157719913420715/ this FlickR gallery] is worth a try. FlickR users tend to gladly change the copyright tag on their uploads when contacted by Wikipedians. Of course, in the case of these photographs one would first have to ascertain who owns the copyright; the uploader says they were taken by his late brother. Other sources might be available too. Surtsicna (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you, {{u|Surtsicna}}. I did email that FlickR user a while ago but did not hear back. I also got a picture via Simon's agency, but see [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/Noticeboard/archive/2022#Forwarded_permissions? this Commons discussion] for what happened with that. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::Ah, that's a shame. I cannot quite tell what happened. The matter just petered out? You went through such a trouble to obtain that photograph. I will try reaching out to the FlickR user via Flickr mail, in case he is not checking his email or yours went to spam. Surtsicna (talk) 01:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Date of birth 2
It seems to be vague and different sources have different dates for this. John (talk) 11:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:Correct. The lady has been very discreet about her age by the looks of things. There are sources that provide both 1959 and 1960 as the year (one source has 1 November 1959, but that is an unreliable one), so we can only have the two possible years. There is a thread above on the topic covering this too. - SchroCat (talk) 16:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::At the very least, the reason for the uncertainty should be noted in the text. Minturn (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Emphasis in lead
{{u|EDRobson}} changed the lead so it started with Simon's RSC roles and then covered her playing the character of Dayna lower down with her other TV credits. He also removed mention of her first role in Joseph and were she trained. {{u|SchroCat}} reverted, suggesting this was a major change warranting discussion on Talk first. So I'm starting a discussion! Before noticing these edits, I also made a small change to the opening sentence, moving the Dayna coverage to a second sentence.
I broadly agree with EDRobson. Her first role in Joseph doesn't warrant being in the lead, or should at least be abbreviated. Dayna is her best known role, but she has a very extensive career beyond that, including notable prizes for After the Fall and Milk and Honey, so I would be happy to see Dayna pushed down in the lead, maybe later in the opening paragraph or along the lines of EDRobson's edit. But what do others think? Bondegezou (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:I would suggest that a first professional role probably is leadworthy, as is the role for which some people will still remember her: a major role in a popular television series. Running them chronologically is entirely proper. I think such a high-profile role, which was early in her career is probably in the right place at the moment, rather than tucked away behind her later, less-known (but rather impressive) work. - SchroCat (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::First professional role in lead... I looked at some other actor's articles. It was a fairly random selection of names! ScarJo's has "Johansson first appeared on stage in an off-Broadway play as a child actress." Imelda Staunton's has "Staunton began her career in repertory theatre in 1976". Michael Caine's doesn't mention his first role. Judy Geeson's doesn't mention her first role. Linda Thorson's doesn't mention her first role (but is obviously currently too short). Xochitl Gomez's says "Gomez made her professional debut in 2018 in Raven's Home." Michael Keating's doesn't mention a first role, but is again rather short. Louise Jameson's doesn't mention her first role.
::So, overall, first roles, particularly if minor, are often not mentioned in leads or are mentioned briefly. Ergo, I think we should remove or shorten the Joseph reference here. Bondegezou (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Off the top of my head, I don't remember any of these being FAs. There are many ways of writing a lead, and I don't think there is any reason to change this one. - SchroCat (talk) 15:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:I agree that Blakes 7 needs mentioning, but there needs to be balance and it was way too high, needs to be further down. I thought EDRobson's edit is good and should be restored. Rankersbo (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::It wasn't good by any stretch. Given this has been through two community review processes, it will need a good consensus to overturn the FA-agreed text. - SchroCat (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Well that's your opinion, mine was it was a vast improvement. Rankersbo (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::We should certainly follow WP:CONSENSUS. I thank those editors who have inputted so far and hope others will too. Bondegezou (talk) 14:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)