Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject China|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Central Asia|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}}

}}

{{Article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=03:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

|action1link=Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots/GA1

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=317019846

|action2=FAC

|action2date=02:29, 6 February 2010

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/July 2009 Ürümqi riots/archive1

|action2result=not promoted

|action2oldid=341643043

|action3=FAC

|action3date=14:32, 27 April 2010

|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/July 2009 Ürümqi riots/archive2

|action3result=not promoted

|action3oldid=358228309

|action4=FAC

|action4date=15:43, 16 May 2010

|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/July 2009 Ürümqi riots/archive3

|action4result=promoted

|action4oldid=362439328

| topic = history

|currentstatus=FA

|maindate=July 5, 2010

|itn1date=6 July 2009|itn1link=Wikipedia:ITN archives/2009/July

|otd1date=2011-07-05|otd1oldid=437940182

|otd2date=2013-07-05|otd2oldid=562794580

|otd3date=2015-07-05|otd3oldid=670062073

|otd4date=2019-07-05|otd4oldid=904945626

|otd5date=2023-07-05|otd5oldid=1163070468

}}

{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}

{{British English}}

{{archive box|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=100|auto=yes}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 7

|minthreadsleft = 4

|algo = old(100d)

|archive = Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Infobox image

Is there an image we could use for the infobox? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Issues with FA status

Following a conversation with @Z1720 at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/July 2009 Ürümqi riots, I'd like to raise some issues with this article. On a quick look I'd be concerned to see this on the front page in its present state for two reasons: 1/ Despite MOS:CITELEDE, there does seem to be a lot of citations in the lead 2/ the aftermath section doesn't really go beyond 2010. Hope that makes sense and that the article could be improved since it's a really interesting topic. Mujinga (talk) 13:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)