Talk:Jurassic World
{{oldafdfull| date = 10 May 2013 | result = speedy keep | page = Jurassic Park 4 }}
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{not a forum}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Film|American=yes}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USfilm=yes|USfilm-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Baffle gab1978 |date=August 06, 2018}}
{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=low}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 2
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Jurassic World/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Annual report|2015|14,283,010}}
{{Top 25 Report|Nov 23 2014 (8th)|May 31 2015 (16th)|Jun 7 2015 (2nd)|Jun 14 2015 (1st)|Jun 21 2015 (2nd)|Jun 28 2015 (4th)|Jul 5 2015 (14th)|Jul 12 2015 (21st)|Jul 19 2015 (13th)}}
{{Archives|auto=short|collapsible=yes|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
fifth-biggest opening day and the fifth-biggest single-day gross The anchor (#Biggest opening day in U.S. and Canada) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.opening-weekend record The anchor (#Biggest opening weekends in U.S. and Canada) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
}}
Redundant comparisons
Undoubtedly, this is a great film with outstanding performance in many aspects but I think we should delete all the other films and their revenue cited in the reception section since such info. is completely irrelevant to Jurassic World itself and not that meaningful. It's well enough to know that it has broken numerous records. Full lists are available on their main pages or references. In dialogue with Biomedicinal 13:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Why not include product placements?
Include. kleinster 03:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
:What product placements? Have reliable sources provided any significant coverage of them? DonIago (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
:: One car brand got way to much screen time. Nobody wants to mention it one more time. --87.141.16.6 (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Horror film?
Reviewing the edit history for this article, I see that multiple IPs have removed the categorization of this film as a horror film, and have consistently been reverted. My question is: why? The lead doesn't describe JW as being a horror film, nor does the body of the article in its current form appear to describe it as such, and I didn't see that the edit summaries provided by the reverting editors ever included a rationale for reinstating the category.
As such, I've taken it upon myself to remove the 'horror film' category. Editors who believe JW should be classified as such are welcome to provide their reasoning here. DonIago (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
:[https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2020204/jurassic-world#film-details The Turner Classic Movie database] classifies it as "horror," which was why editors were categorizing it as horror here. Mr Fink (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks; I don't have any objection to that, but it should be added to the article before the category is re-added, as categories are required to be supported by the article's verifiable content. DonIago (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)