Talk:Justin Bieber on Twitter#Additional articles are needed

{{WikiProject banner shell|1=

}}

{{Copied |from=Justin Bieber on Twitter|to=Justin Bieber |to_diff=489334032|to_oldid=489327107 |date=27 April 2012}}

{{ArticleHistory

|action1=GAN

|action1date=10:26, 10 June 2012

|action1link=Talk:Justin Bieber on Twitter/GA1

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=496879887

|action2=FAC

|action2date=01:57, 3 July 2012

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Justin Bieber on Twitter/archive1

|action2result=not promoted

|action2oldid=500397713

|action3=AFD

|action3date=08:37, 9 July 2012

|action3link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter

|action3result=delete

|dykdate=5 May 2012

|dykentry=... that @ladygaga (pictured) and @justinbieber are, respectively, the first and second most-followed celebrities on Twitter?

|topic=Media and journalism

|currentstatus=DGA

}}

{{olddrvfull|date=July 9, 2012|result=No consensus to overturn|page=Log/2012 July 9}}

Moving this article into userspace?

I think people have worked hard on this article a lot. Therefore, someone, like a creator, can take care of this article once and for all. --George Ho (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

:No, to maintain GFDL, this needs to stay here so the history can be accessed and it can be a proper redirect. Lady of Shalott 16:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

::Someone might commit vandalism. Userspace is the only way. --George Ho (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

:::Someone might commit vandalism on any given article or redirect that exists. So? You revert it. If it becomes a frequent problem, we protect the page. Userspace is not the only, or, because of the GFDL requirements, even a valid way. LadyofShalott 02:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)