Talk:Kawasaki C-2#reqmovetag

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Aviation|class=start

| b1 = y

| b2 = y

| b3 = y

| b4 = y

| b5 = y

|Aircraft-project=yes}}

{{WikiProject Military history|class=b|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Aviation=yes|Japanese=yes}}

{{WikiProject Japan|importance=low|milhist=y}}

}}

Photograph

(not given supporting materials due to uncertainty over licensing of the photograph)

I am a user of a Japanese version.

Is the copyright in this photograph really GFDL?

Japan defense ministry Technical Research and Development Institute is forbidding reprint without permission in the photograph.

[http://www.mod.go.jp/trdi/riyou.html TRDI (Japanese)]--210.131.1.48 13:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Proper designation

What is this aircraft's proper designation - the article uses a mix of "C-X", "XC-2" and "C-2". It isn't always clear which designation relates to which stage of the development process.

As I understand it the initial design was called "C-X", the test prototype(s) "XC-2" and the actual certified production version is the "C-2". I'm not at all sure that I understand it correctly and the article (as it is now) doesn't really help to clarify the matter. Roger (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

:The development program was designated C-X, The first prototype is designasted XC-2, the procurement program is designated C-2. Seemples, yes.Petebutt (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: insufficient support. DrKiernan (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

----

Kawasaki C-2 → {{no redirect|Kawasaki XC-2}} – To reflect the name of the aircraft rather than the procurement program. Per Kawasaki Heavy Industries' own website: http://www.khi.co.jp/english/aero/product/airplanes/xc_2.html memphisto 12:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

:Oppose the XC-2 is only the prototype, if it doesnt go into production it may be appropriate but it is certain the series build aircraft will be C-2s. MilborneOne (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Main accidents

Can somebody write in the article some sentences of accidents of this aircraft?--Porbóllett (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

: Only accidents are probably notable here. And based on what sources? --Finlayson (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)