Talk:Kerry slug
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=20:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
|action1link=/GA1
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=316094537
|action2=FAC
|action2date=19:12, 10 October 2009
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kerry slug/archive1
|action2result=not promoted
|action2oldid=318882958
|action3=FAC
|action3date=18:51, 3 November 2009
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kerry slug/archive2
|action3result=not promoted
|action3oldid=323674806
| topic = natsci
|currentstatus=GA
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|
{{WikiProject Gastropods|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Galicia|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Portugal|importance=Low}}
}}
Some notes for Featured Article Candidacy
When reviewing for GA, I often try to give some pointers to punt articles (eventually) in the direction of FAC. Thus this is where the real polishing of the article starts to come into play (i.e. making the refs all nice-looking). Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
:I'll do something about the refs.--Daniel Cavallari (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
::Great. Cite format is easy with the far right tab above the editing box :) It would be good to get the last couple of papers too named in the article. And turning redlinks blue is always helpful. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
::References are now placed in citation templates, but it did not improved the quality of article at all, because there is not chosen standard for bibliographic referencing on wikipedia and references were already in consistently formated. --Snek01 (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
About distribution red links
Most of the red links on the Distribution content may be turned blue. It's a simple translation problem (locations are in spanish, whereas the articles are in english). I had fixed most of them, but everything I had done was lost due to an editing conflict. I'll do it again later...--Daniel Cavallari (talk) 19:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
:I have tidied the section on distribution in Spain building on the work of other editors. I am still not satisfied with some of the nomenclature regarding the relevant Natura 2000 sites - some sites are identifiable as SPAs (ie bird sites), presumably SAC status will follow in due course. -Alan (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kerry slug. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=778706648 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091226080709/http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_naturais/FAUNA/invertebrados/Geomalacus%20maculosus.pdf to http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_naturais/FAUNA/invertebrados/Geomalacus%20maculosus.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218122401/http://www.npws.ie/en/media/Media%2C5189%2Cen.pdf to http://www.npws.ie/en/media/Media%2C5189%2Cen.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)