Talk:Kevin Plawecki

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kevin Plawecki. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=778753282 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6IJInGB8Y?url=http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/big10/sports/m-basebl/auto_pdf/2012-13/misc_non_event/b1grecordsbookbase.pdf to http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/big10/sports/m-basebl/auto_pdf/2012-13/misc_non_event/b1grecordsbookbase.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Questions: 1. Does the Kevin Plawecki dildo incident deserve coverage in the article? 2. Does the previously-written coverage on this violate WP:BLP? I would contend yes and no (although there may be a point about WP:SYNTH, although I think it's 50/50). Editosaurus (talk) 23:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:(1) A dildo in a locker creates sensationalist coverage, which is not what Wikipedia is about. (2) It's clear that speculating about this dildo being related to Matt Harvey's suspension is WP:OR / WP:SYNTH, and therefore a BLP violation. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

::I'm not speculating that the dildo is related to the Harvey suspension --- in fact, I sought to clarify that the two were not related --- I merely am making an acknowledgement of the speculation that had to be cleared up about this subject. As the Mets org (incl. through beat writers) specifically stated that the two were not related, then, setting aside the notability of the dildo incident, the Harvey speculation being cleared up deserves mention. Editosaurus (talk) 23:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)