Talk:Kingdom Rush
{{GA|00:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)|topic=Video games|page=1|oldid=1172731167}}
{{DYK talk|14 September|2023|entry=... that the success of Kingdom Rush prompted plans to grow the video game industry of Uruguay?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Kingdom Rush}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=low}}
}}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
40px This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2021 and 16 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JWmelrow.
{{small|Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
Merger proposal
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was procedural close. Request violates WP:NOTMERGE reason #3, as both pages are topics warranting their own articles. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)}}
File:Merge-arrows.svg Formal request has been received to merge: Kingdom Rush: Origins into Kingdom Rush; dated: February 1, 2023. Proposer's Rationale: it isn't notable enough for its own article, all unique info (like reviews) is on the Kingdom Rush article for the other games in the series. — Sir Magnus. Discuss here. GenQuest "scribble" 19:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
:Oppose. I don't see how WP:MERGEREASON applies here. All five reviews talk about the game distinctly from the first Kingdom Rush and gave different critical opinions (i.e. superior level design). The game even has some development information [https://www.shacknews.com/article/87249/kingdom-rush-origins-blends-tower-defense-with-role-playing]. WP:NOTMERGE says that merging should be avoided if both are distinct topics and meet the WP:GNG (even if both are related). The Night Watch (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
::Comment. I also find that the article for Kingdom Rush has a bit of an inconsistent tone between the first game and the series as a whole. If this Merger proposal is declined, there appears to be sufficient material to create articles that talk about each of the titles individually. The Night Watch (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}
{{Talk:Kingdom Rush/GA1}}
Did you know nomination
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Kingdom Rush}}
[[Kingdom Rush: Frontiers]] and [[Kingdom Rush: Vengeance]] need their own entries
This is a popular franchise, I am sure all of those games have stand-alone notability. Kingdom Rush: Origins has its own entry already. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
:@Piotrus Vengeance may not have enough reviews last time I checked, but Frontiers certainly has enough if you want to create it. The Night Watch (talk) 05:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
::@The Night Watch I'd expect both to have enough but starting with Frontiers makes sense. Whether I'll do it anytime soon, hmmm. I am a bit eclectic with what I create, since there are zillions of topics I am interested in :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
:I attempted to make Kingdom Rush 5: Alliance however, I don't know if it would last. I do believe all 6 games should get an article. I also think there should be one for Kingdom Rush (series). LuxembourgLover (talk) 22:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
::@LuxembourgLover @The Night Watch Well, upcoming games are the least notable. I'd recommend working on the older titles first, they likely have some reviews etc. Upcoming titles often have just marketing buzz and fail WP:NSOFT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)