Talk:Lead chalcogenide

We don't have separate chalcogenide articles on each element. Instead, a simpler way of pointing readers to related compounds is to fill out the "related compounds'' section of the ChemBox or to have a section below. This method serves readers better, it seems. This article would then become a redirect to the most important lead chalcogenide.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Redirected, there's not much useful to merge, if any. The article as it last was just defines the term. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

:I would probably have a soft redirect. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC)