Talk:Leduc 022/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Leduc 022/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Leduc 022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Can attend to shortly Eddie891 Talk Work 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

:* Sources look reliable, prepared to AGF

:* Is it standard to capitalize "throughout the Fifties " ?

::*Yes, unless you're using the digits instead.

:* It's not immediately clear to me what "Intended for service use," service refers to here-- remember that all work in the armed services can be called "service"

:* I don't understand "and a time to 25,000 metres (82,000 ft) of only seven minutes." -- if it's just me being dull, feel free to explain here instead of in the article

::* See if my change makes it any clearer

:* Any information on the cost of the prototype?

:* Is it really worth putting the sentence under 'Surviving aircraft' as a bullet point?

:* MOS:ELLAYOUT recommends accompanying an entry in the 'external links' section with a brief description if it isn't clear what it is

::*Indeed it does.

:That's anything from me Eddie891 Talk Work 01:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks for taking the time to review it, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:::{{ping|user:Eddie891}}--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)