Talk:Level Crossing Removal Project

{{u|True Believers}}: Your edits to the crossing table have been good for clarity and information, thank you. However, the "preferred solution" column should be sourced for each level crossing or left blank if a reliable source does not exist. Triptothecottage (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

@Triptothecottage

It's on the Level Crossing Removal website. Here is the link to the general 25 extra crossings.

https://levelcrossings.vic.gov.au/media/news/More-level-crossing-removals-on-the-way

If you have a look at the fact sheets in each individual one or watch the videos, they show a preferred solution.

Sorry I forgot to add that in. I will do it now True Believers (talk) 06:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I have added some sections of topics that need to be added and expanded upon to allow the article to be given B-class status. Please feel free to expand upon these sections with text, photos, and media. DO NOT remove these sections even though they are blank- I will be adding to the sections in the near future alongside other members of the wikipedia community. HoHo3143 (talk) 11:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

:Thanks for this. Is there a guide somewhere for how these articles (or B-class status articles) should be structured and why those particular sections need to be included? Also, do you think the Reception and Criticism sections should come after the lists? I was thinking for this particular article the LXR lists are the more important information that visitors will want to see first. Gracchus250 (talk) 23:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

::Not sure if there is a structure guide, however I have followed layouts from the Suburban Rail Loop and Metro Tunnel articles. I'd keep the reception and criticisms before the lists, as the lists are quite long and could disengage the reader from reading further. If you'd like to, could you please start on some of the empty sections in Reception and Criticisms and/or expand the Media area of the Reception section. Thank you! HoHo3143 (talk) 10:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

{{Talk:Level Crossing Removal Project/GA1}}

{{Template:Did you know nominations/Level Crossing Removal Project}}

The sale of an income-generating asset through privatisation doesn't yield a "magic pudding" which can be used to fund non-income generating projects, such as urban infrastructure. I'll add a section on this. JQ (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was, boldly merged/redirected by Triptothecottage. JuniperChill (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)}}

I am not sure if a very short stub article is acceptable when it could be placed here, so I am proposing a discussion to merge LXRA to LXRP. It's only two paragraphs/three sentences and an infobox JuniperChill (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

:I’ve WP:BOLDly gone ahead and turned it back into a redirect. There was no content that isn’t covered in this article. Triptothecottage (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

{{Discussion bottom}}