Talk:Libs of TikTok#"The account spreads false claims and hateful commentary"
{{Talk header}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Round in circles|search=no}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|blp=y|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Internet|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |American=yes |American-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies}}
{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject TikTok}}
{{WikiProject Oklahoma|importance=Low}}
{{Wiki Loves Pride talk|2022}}
}}
{{Press|subject=article|author=D'Anne Witkowski|title=Creep of the Week: Libs of TikTok|org=Out in Jersey|url=https://outinjersey.net/creep-of-the-week-libs-of-tiktok/|quote=Now, if you’re old like me, you might be wondering why an account called Libs of TikTok is on Twitter and not, say, only TikTok. All I can tell you is that the world is a multifaceted digital hellscape. Wikipedia explains it better: "Libs of TikTok is a far-right Twitter account owned by former real estate worker Chaya Raichik. The account reposts content created by liberals, leftists, and LGBT people on TikTok and on other social media platforms, often with hostile, derogatory, or mocking commentary."|date=September 14, 2022|accessdate=September 17, 2022
|author2 = David Israel
|title2 = When Did ADL Start Hunting Down Jews?
|date2 = September 5, 2023
|org2 = The Jewish Press
|url2 = https://www.jewishpress.com/news/left-vs-right/adl-no-longer-hunts-down-antisemites-its-hunting-down-jews/2023/09/05/
|lang2 =
|quote2 = By the way, the Libs of TikTok Wikipedia page has been raided by anti-Raichik editors who made the anarchist demonstrations on Kaplan Street look like a birthday party. It is possibly the most vicious Wiki edit job I have seen.
|archiveurl2 =
|archivedate2 =
|accessdate2 = June 19, 2024
}}
{{Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|gg|1RR=yes}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|blp|brief}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap|brief}}
{{banner holder|text=Media mentions, page views, and other notices|collapsed=yes|1=
{{page views}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:Libs of TikTok/Archive
|format= %%i
|age=2160
|header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
|maxarchsize=100000
|minkeepthreads=4
|numberstart=3
|archivebox=no
|box-advert=no
}}
Update to the account suspensions section
Libs of TikTok was officially banned from BlueSky two days ago. In my opinion, since her other account suspensions are mentioned in the account suspensions section, this should be included. The source is here.https://www.advocate.com/business/bluesky-libs-of-tiktok-suspended 2600:1003:B13D:667A:0:16:B3F2:D601 (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC) 2600:1003:B13D:667A:0:16:B3F2:D601 (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
Alt-right
Look, I do not even agree with the characterization of Chaya/Libs as "far-right" but a lot of media outlets have called her that, so I can't really do anything about that, but the only thing in this article that even slightly suggests Chaya is alt right is when "Slate linked Libs of TikTok's early success to "shamelessly tagging alt-right and far-right heavy hitters on Twitter, a strategy she continues to use to this day"."
This isn't really enough to justify putting her into Twitter's Alt Right category. 78.150.95.227 (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
:I mean would it be better to make a Category:Neo-Nazi hopefuls? CUPIDICAE❤️ 20:44, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
:: This isn't a real category 78.150.95.227 (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
::{{ping|praxidicae}} make a constructive remark or don’t comment at all. I originally deleted this for a reason. Dronebogus (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
:::Would you like a cookie, or what? CUPIDICAE❤️ 20:15, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
:::Also enlighten me as to what your removal has to do with anything? I didn't see a removal and responded only cause you pinged me. CUPIDICAE❤️ 20:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
:::: i'm not sure why the person removed the entire conversation at first, but i brought it back, your reply was frivolous and didn't add anything to the discussion, make a constructive remark or don’t comment at all 78.150.95.227 (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
::::For once I’m siding with the IP, not necessarily on their opinion but on your flippant behavior. I chopped the section because it didn’t seem productive, mainly because I’m a bit trigger-happy with brand-new editors showing up and making complaints about political labels on controversial articles but also because of your borderline trolling of someone who legitimately doesn’t seem to know any better. Dronebogus (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Why is "accounts" plural?
Libs of TikTok is just one Twitter account, the way its worded it sounds like a group of accounts 1timeuse75 (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
:Because it has accounts on multiple platforms. Akechi The Agent Of Chaos (talk) 02:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
::Ah ok, should the platforms be listed on the page or not? 1timeuse75 (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Tiktok and Twitter are listed. Akechi The Agent Of Chaos (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Twitter suspensions
We have since found out that Twitter had said LoTT never actually violated any of their rules. It was admitted by moderators in the Twitter files. Cunit1070 (talk) 23:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
:Hateful conduct is violating rules 2600:6C60:3C40:170D:C56:369B:DA5B:FD1C (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
:Probably historical revisionism by Musk’s cronies Dronebogus (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
A number of news articles mention her being features on ICE raids
[https://newrepublic.com/article/193820/kristi-noem-ice-libs-tik-tok?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tnr_daily] Doug Weller talk 09:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
The article is a bit biased
{{atop
| result = WP:FORUMing. Please provide a clear change and sourcing to improve the article and show something actionable. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
}}
The article makes statements perceived as attacks against Libs of TikTok. While people may have freedom of beliefs, including article writers, Wikipedia is supposed to be an impartial and unbiased information center, not a propaganda machine. Examples include labeling it as “hate speech” and labeling their claims as “false”. 2600:1700:D71:10E0:E823:E1D1:8AB8:2F80 (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
:The label of hate speech has already been discussed. I certainly prefer more precise terminology (hate speech is quite arbitrary/subjective). However, Doug Weller is an experienced administrator and I deferred to his judgement that it should stay. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}