Talk:List of business routes of the Interstate Highway System

I wanted to propose a reformat of this page. I think that if the page were broken up into sections of 10 interstates and their respective auxilliary routes. for instance all single digit interstates 1 thru 9, then tens interstates 10 thru 19, etc

Not only would that revise the Table of Contents to a more navigable format by simplifying it it will also break up the page into more manageable sections for future editing.--S dog100 (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Why can't I fix the column for I-375 Business? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

:It was missing a |- to start the new row on the table. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_business_routes_of_the_Interstate_Highway_System&diff=583409586&oldid=578475185 This edit] fixed that. Imzadi 1979 → 17:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

This page is missing several routes, such as the I-385 business spur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Carolina Alliance (talk • contribs) 20:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

In what order are these entries supposed to appear? Some are in geographic (west-to-east, south-to-north) order. Some are in reverse geographic order (I-75 is north-to-south), and some are alphabetical (I-69 has Charlotte before Coldwater, but geographically Coldwater would be first as it is further south). I suggest that we decide on which order will be used. I suggest geographic order, west-to-east or south-to-north. Imzadi 1979 → 23:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

:I think alphabetical by disambiguator, separated by state, is the most logical sorting. Most of our readers do not necessarily know the geographic order that the routes go, but they could easily figure out A, B, C. On that note, I think this table format is tired. I don't know if the {{tlx|Routelist row}} format is any better. I'd like to see a bulleted list format like so:

;California

{{columns-list|colwidth=20em|

:Arbuckle loop

:Cottonwood loop

...

:Obviously, we'd switch out loop for spur or downtown loop/spur where necessary. And we'd also need to figure out a way to effectively mark former routes, but those are relatively easy to figure out. –Fredddie™ 21:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm sure there are plenty of people who question the existence of some of these routes, and I'm no exception to that. Like Interstate 80 Business (Pine Bluffs, Wyoming); I see no evidence that the route exists, or has existed in the past. Also, there's Interstate 95 Business (Mystic, Connecticut); I actually don't find it hard to believe such a route existed, but proof is always welcome. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of business routes of the Interstate Highway System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060526122908/http://cms.transportation.org/sites/route/docs/1997-USRN_Cmte.pdf to http://cms.transportation.org/sites/route/docs/1997-USRN_Cmte.pdf
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Districts/District11/traffic/I-376_Exits.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Hey all! I'm at a bit of a loss... why aren't the I-80 links for Pine Bluffs, Wyoming and Sidney, Nebraska not working ;o ??? Driving me up a wall -- what am I doing wrong xD ??! Thx :) ~ Hanyou23 (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)