Talk:Lithium-titanate battery#Merger proposal

When comparing Titanate and standard technology the articles compares Wh/kg (energy per weight) and Wh/L (energy per volume), any chance someone can find the same data in the same units? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.130.239.161 (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

{{discussion top|1=The practical result was delete and redirect.}}

I'm proposing a merger of the information in SCIB into Lithium-titanate battery. SCiB is just a brand name Toshiba uses for their Lithium-titanate battery and is not notable for a page on its own. Also, the page SCIB is written in a form too close to WP:ADS. Thanks for your input. --Muhandes (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

:SCiB should just be deleted. Brand names are not appropriate in the article. There will be other brands of Lithium-titanate battery. No point having a section on one particular brand. It's just advertising for Toshiba. Delete it.--Lester 12:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

::I just redirected the SCIB article to here, as it was blatant advertising. The previous version of the SCIB can still be viewed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SCIB&oldid=371751857 here]. SCIB is just another brand of Lithium Titanate battery ([http://www.greentechmedia.com/green-light/post/toshibas-batteries-for-electric-cars-and-bikes-scib-620/ reference]). In fact, the term SCIB is actually a trademark owned by Toshiba.--Lester 20:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

:: I thought we were having a discussion, but I guess you decided so there is no need for that. --Muhandes (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

{{discussion bottom}}

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on Lithium–titanate battery. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=701430391 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100526103917/http://www.lightningcarcompany.co.uk:80/nanosafe.php to http://www.lightningcarcompany.co.uk/nanosafe.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100729205202/http://www.phoenixmotorcars.com:80/vehicles/phoenix-sut.php to http://www.phoenixmotorcars.com/vehicles/phoenix-sut.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090301002023/http://proterraonline.com:80/partners.asp to http://www.proterraonline.com/partners.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

In the USA and Europe, the miev does not use Lithium Titanate cells nor SCiB from Toshiba--it has a full pack at 360VDC and uses 88 cells made by Yuasa, the LEV50. The information in the blog by Stephen cited in the article as footnote #1 is not correct.

Here is info on the LEV50, http://lithiumenergy.jp/en/products/

a simple search also found reference to this cell being used: http://www.gsbattery.com/renewable-energy-electric-car

and info from Mitsubishi, http://www.mitsubishicars.com

Additional searching revealed that some Japanese-only versions of the car used a lower capacity battery pack made up of the LTO cells, http://pushevs.com/2016/05/09/toshiba-scib-introduces-a-new-23-ah-cell/ so i would like to see this noted in the article. kenny (173.25.249.251 (talk) 11:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC))

kenny (173.25.249.251 (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC))

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium–titanate battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140525200937/http://www.tosa2013.com/en to http://www.tosa2013.com/en
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.schwinnelectricbikes.com/tailwind/electric_bike_technology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Why the fuck is this in the article? Whatever the brand, the technology is identical. This is bullshit. 174.115.100.93 (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

:It should probably be removed, with relevant information moved elsewhere in the article. --Ita140188 (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

The article's name is "Lithium titanate", but in the introduction it refers to it as "Lithium titanate oxide", in any case, titanate already refers to an oxide, the two terms that might be interchangable should be Lithium Titanate and Lithium-titanium oxide, perhaps I am missing something? In any case, I would include both correct names in the intro.

--Bsckr (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Sure, it lasts for many thousands of charge cycles, however, will it last simply ten years? 2600:6C51:423F:48C5:1120:2D0B:738E:4597 (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

What's the charge curves, like at what percent discharge is it when at 2v for example. 2600:6C51:423F:48C5:70EA:7044:6406:5B39 (talk) 02:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_FA22_-_Sect_201_-_Thu_(Fall_2022) | assignments = Xj416 | start_date = 2022-09-21 | end_date = 2022-12-08 }}

— Assignment last updated by Xj416 (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)