Talk:Madison Eagles

{{Old AfD multi

|date1 = June 19 2009 |result1 = delete |page1 = Madison Eagles

|date2 = April 14 2010 |result2 = delete |page2 = Madison Eagles (2nd nomination)

|date3 = June 15 2010 |result3 = delete |page3 = Madison Eagles (3rd nomination)

|date4 = March 9 2013 |result4 = delete |page4 = Madison Eagles (4th nomination)

|date5 = 4 April 2014 | result5 = keep |page5 = Madison Eagles (5th nomination)

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Eagles, Madison|blp=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20140403012656|reviewer=Anne Delong}}

{{WikiProject Biography|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low}}

{{WikiProject Professional wrestling|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Australia|importance=Low|sports=y}}

{{WikiProject Women's sport|importance=low|martialarts=yes}}

{{WikiProject Women in Business|importance=low}}

}}

Untitled

Please note: The sources in this article have been considerably expanded since the last deletion. Also new sourced information about her 2013 appearances has been added. I check with an admin, Hahc21, to make sure that the draft was substantially different from the deleted version before moving it to mainspace. I hope that this will be taken into account when deciding whether to speedily delete. —Anne Delong (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion reasons

Contested speedy due to substantive differences. Content may be different but notability issues remain per all the previous nominations. Coverage does not prove notability and has done nothing notable aside from maybe the SHIMMER title and notability is not inherited from that title. Number 1 in PWI yearly list has already been ruled in previous AfD's as not enough for notability, likely for the same reason. No evidence of substantive overseas work outside of SHIMMER (the odd match at other promotions are not enough). 124.180.170.151 (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

: After this clear case of WP:SNOW was ignored and the DRV failed, I give notice that I will be working to fix this article to make sure that all the weaknesses that I didn't get the chance to detail become obvious. This woman is not notable and I intend to prove it the only way I can, and that's challenge as much as I reasonably can. I have already identified zoom.info as an unreliable source and removed it. Anything that is line ball I will be seeking a consensus on here and there are already a couple of possibilities, but I'll leave it for tonight. 124.180.170.151 (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

::Agree about ZoomInfo. Its WIkipedia article says that it's a search engine, not a content creator. —Anne Delong (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

:Update: The IP has been blocked as a sockpuppet of banned User:Justa Punk. GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

:::Well, in spite of this taking up a lot various editors' time, the result has been a considerable improvement in the article. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)