Talk:Manhunt 2

{{Article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=2 July 2013

|action1link = Talk:Manhunt 2/GA1

|action1result=failed

|action2=GAN

|action2date=22 December 2013

|action2link=/GA2

|action2result=failed

|currentstatus=FGAN

|topic=video games}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Video games |class=B |importance=mid }}

{{WikiProject Horror |importance=low}}

}}

{{Archive box|auto=yes}}

Renomination

I was the one who nominated the article and was also one of its editors. Unfortunately I was absent from Wikipedia for two months when the review actually happened, and thus was not present to help out in the review (but I was HERE when it was still in the nom list). Sorry David Fuchs if you reviewed the game without any progress from your evaluation. The other main editors were busy fixing the Red Dead Redemption article (which was also a GA review). I will try to fix the article, and nominate it for another run as a GA. Godzilladude123 (talk)

Re: Finished editing the article for another nomination. Will wait less than a week for final editings. Then to the nominations. Godzilladude123 (talk) 04:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

::For what its worth, I'd just like to add my eight cents. I think the longer version of the article is far superior to this edited version. As someone who has used this article for professional purposes, I think removing the Chronology of events table is a grave error, it was a great at-a-glance reference tool for a complex sequence of events. Taking it out is a perfect example of the awful homogenization that happens when good, thorough articles are submitted for GA/FA review and get reduced down to bare essentials. A lot of very well researched and well written info has been removed for no reason other than getting the article up to GA standard. Also, shouldn't User:Bertaut be consulted in all this, as he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manhunt_2&diff=526627959&oldid=523589283 wrote the vast majority of the article]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.19.85 (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

:::No. If you read the GA Review above, the reviewer stated that the controversy is better as a prose than a timeline. And don't worry, the editors didn't reduce it down to "bare essentials". We just trimmed the aweful amount of quotation that made reading a chore, as per Wikipedia:Quotations rule. The gameplay too was fixed, and the heading was expanded. Those were the only ones that were changed. No major infos were touched. The rest are scot free. And this User:Bertaut, I don't know about him/her but he didn't showed up when the article was being reviewed for almost two months.Godzilladude123 (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Script Error

There's this script error in the reception section, and I have no idea on how to remove it without removing the score table. PLEASE HELP!180.190.137.222 (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

"Red Kings" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Red Kings}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"The Red Kings" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Red Kings and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#The Red Kings}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"Project Militia" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Project Militia}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"The Project Militia" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Project Militia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#The Project Militia}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 17:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"Dr. Pickman" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Dr. Pickman and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Dr. Pickman}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"Judy Sender" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Judy Sender and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Judy Sender}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"The Bloodhounds" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Bloodhounds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#The Bloodhounds}} until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Genre of manhunt 2

Show ne any proofs that games genre box/descriptions should contain only the primary genres. Its visivle from the games box art its a horror . And inter et spurces claim it to be one MrDante1047 (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

:You continue making unsourced genre changes despite the discussions we had for other games and numerous reverts by various users. This game has a horror settings, but is not in the survival horror genre. It has been specifically [https://www.gamespot.com/articles/manhunt-2-producer-qanda/1100-6181831/ described] as unique horr-stealth game and not survival horror. The template docs also require not to include thematic genres. In the future, please get consensus before edit warring. IceWelder [] 11:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

::Horror isnt the secondary genre of this game rather than the first one. Its box art tells its a horror as well.s stealth. Wikipedia editers are becoming more and more self roghteous and dismissing others points.

::Plese lets include in the description article that its a horror stealth video game 46.71.132.92 (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

:::"Horror" is a theme, not a genre. IceWelder [] 17:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

::::Horror is a full fledged genre not a theme

::::https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horror_game#:~:text=A%20horror%20game%20is%20a,a%20variety%20of%20gameplay%20types. 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

::::dont you know about survival horror as well as psychological horror genres exist to say "horror is not a genre" ,google it up tp be sure for yourself 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

::::However edots wikipedia ,if you are an editor you shoullb be basing it i

::::up on facts rather youre own feeling,factual evidences exost and reading articles,literatire will expose people to genres,googling also does help. Wikipedia editors shouldnt be self righteous. Just "horror as game genre" my source whoch is the wikipedia article shows sources for horror being a ganre in games 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

::::https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survival_horror

::::Proof of horror being a genre with references 46.70.127.166 (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

::::Wikipedia can't be used for references on Wikipedia. Please find an independent, reliable source that considers Manhunt 2 a survival horror game. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

:::::https://www.gamesradar.com/manhunt-2-13/

:::::Dear SOETERMANS i war arguing.over Manhunt 2 being a horror-stealth game and showed facts that "horror" genre as a whole does exist in games rather than ICE Welder claiming its a theme not a genre of its own.

:::::This is article from games radar claiming it to be a stealth-horror i showed facts that horror games exist not as a theme, i see no reason why we cant describe this game as horror and stealth game, firstly horror if its what it is 46.70.127.166 (talk) 21:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

::::::The above is spam by the indef-blocked user that started the discussion. Please WP:DENY. IceWelder [] 07:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

The gameplay is pure stealth, it doesnt have any survival horror elements in its gameplay --FMSky (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)