Talk:Mareco Broadcasting Network#Reason for deletion
{{afd-merged-from|DWBM-TV|DWBM-TV (2nd nomination)|29 August 2015}}
{{oldafdfull| date = 17 December 2014 (UTC) | result = nomination withdrawn | page = Mareco Broadcasting Network, Inc. (2nd nomination) }}
{{Old AfD multi
| date = October 25, 2015
| result = keep
| page = Mareco Broadcasting Network
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Radio Stations|importance=Low}}
}}
CSD
- Previously deleted for COPYVIO
- Seems to be basically spam
- No notability
Shem (talk) 20:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
:They operate two radio station in the capital city! Just because its not in new york and you haven't heard of them doesn't mean it shouldn't have a wikipedia article like all the backwater american stations do.
:source :http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno8108.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.79.242 (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
::Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) on what constitutes a notable company. The CSD tag will be removed by the Admin who checks it for deletion or not. Please don't remove it yourself. Shem (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
WHY DO YOU KEEP TRYING TO DELETE IT AS SPAM - IT IS NOT AN ADVERT BUT CONTAINS BASIC INFORMATION...HOW IS THIS PROMOTIONAL??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.79.242 (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Let me add reference and stop taking the reference away again. I am working on this. It is not promotional but about the major radio station in the capital city. --129.234.79.242 (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
:You could well be right - but you're going the wrong way about it so far. Do what the box says, and add the
Reason for deletion
The subject has no significant coverages in reliable sources, only trivial mentions, saying that it's one of the sponsors of the Philippine Airlines Interclub Golf Tournament. 121.54.54.170 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Reliable sources may not necessary for old repute Wikienglish123 (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
: Umm...that's exactly what reputation leads to - reliable sources. Aryamanaroratalk, contribs 19:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)