Talk:Materialization (paranormal)

{{talk header}}

{{ArbComPseudoscience}}

{{oldafdfull| date = 5 September 2014 (UTC) | result = no consensus | page = Materialization (paranormal) }}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|

{{WikiProject Psychology}}

{{WikiProject Skepticism}}

{{WikiProject Paranormal}}

}}

{{Annual readership}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(30d)

| archive = Talk:Materialization (paranormal)/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 1

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 3

}}

Requested move 17 May 2018

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/c 16:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

----

:Materialization (paranormal) → {{no redirect|Materialization}} – Everything else at the disambiguation page is more of a dicdef than actually mentioned in the linked pages. This is the only actual article for the term. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Oppose - fails the WP:ASTONISH test mostly due to many sci-fi usages. I also think the article might be misnamed, "materialization" was a word coined later (1870s or so) when more sophisticated spiritualists claimed to produce tangible "material" objects. Because of this, I suggest Manifestation (paranormal) as a better, broader term because it includes any evidence of spiritual presence, including simple audible or visual "apparitions", in addition to more complex "materializations". [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=materialization%3D%3Espirit%2Cmanifestation%3D%3Espirit&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cmaterialization%3D%3Espirit%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmanifestation%3D%3Espirit%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngram for evidence] (hit the blue button if you don't see a graph). I think the article is conflating the two words in some spots, but I don't have access to several of the sources used to directly verify. -- Netoholic @ 00:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose the sci-fi meanings will be far commoner for most readers than ghosts. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I usually hear "materialize" in the form of supernatural phenomena. e.g. "The ghost materialized in front of me." I dispute that the use of the term in sci-fi is "far more common". Rather than "dematerialized", teleported things are usually described as, well, teleported.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose. There's enough doubt here for disambiguation to be the best choice. Andrewa (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

----

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

nguvu zipo?

kweLi mawasiliano na wafu ipo?

siamini nita Pata wapi mkweli?

nguvu hizo zipo kwanani?

nisaidie 197.239.12.129 (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)