Talk:McDonald's

{{Skip to talk}}

{{Talk header|search=yes}}

{{American English}}

{{Article history

|action1 = FAC

|action1date = 12:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

|action1link = Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/McDonald's

|action1result = Failed

|action1oldid = 13918192

|action2 = AFD

|action2date = 25 August 2011 (UTC)

|action2link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonald's

|action2result = speedily kept

|action2oldid = 424147975

|otddate = 15 April 2011

|action3 = GAN

|action3date = 03:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

|action3link = Talk:McDonald's/GA1

|action3result = failed

|action3oldid = 1292453930

|currentstatus = FFAC

|topic = Agriculture, food and drink

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=High }}

{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject California|importance=Mid|southerncalifornia=yes|southerncalifornia-importance=Easy|inland-empire=yes|inland-empire-importance=Easy}}

{{WikiProject Companies|importance=top }}

{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=top |Foodservice=yes }}

{{WikiProject United States|importance=high}}

}}

{{Online source|year=2006|section=June 2006|author=Hessel, Evan|date=19 June 2006|url=http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2006/0619/056.html|title=Shillipedia|org=Forbes}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Talk:McDonald's/Archive index

|mask=Talk:McDonald's/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 8

|minthreadsleft = 5

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:McDonald's/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{McDonald's talk}}

More controversy

Can you add that McDonald's IS NOT GLUTEN FREE? 206.57.152.111 (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{not done}}: That isn't really a "controversy", unless you have some sourcing that describes it that way. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

:Why would you think that they would be? Hamburger buns are made from WHEAT. Gluten comes from WHEAT. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 21:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Outdated employee* numbers

Hi! This is my first time here.

I noticed that the employee number of (1.7 million) on this page is outdated. This Britannica article from 2024-12-12 states that "It is also one of the world’s largest private employers, with more than 150,000 company employees and 2,000,000 workers at franchised locations." [https://www.britannica.com/money/McDonalds]

Seems like the 1.7 million number in the WorldAtlas [20] and MSN [21] pages are from 2011 or earlier, as this Business Insider article from that time states the same number. [https://www.businessinsider.com/the-10-biggest-employers-in-the-world-2011-9#walmart-21-million-3]

Also wondering if company employees is the correct term for people working at franchise locations? Zeinhob Geckoran (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

{{Talk:McDonald's/GA1}}

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

The re-adding of removed content

@Floating Orb, I saw you re-added the gallery section and removed content from the criticism section. The gallery should be removed as per Wikipedia:GALLERY and the criticism additions (the ones before the subsections) should be removed as per Wikipedia:BLOATED (except for the Fast Food Nation criticism). The criticism before the subsections are meant to serve as highly notable examples, which can either lead into the subsections or summerize the most important events/criticism (depending on the type of reader). Mikeycdiamond (talk) 01:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:Okay. I'll undo the extra stuff. Floating Orb (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:Done. Floating Orb (talk) 02:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::To clarify, when I cited BLOATED, I was talking about the stuff before the criticism subsections. If you want to re-add the animal cruelty part I would support it. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Oh, okay. Floating Orb (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Sourcing

{{u|Mikeycdiamond}}, I see based on this edit summary you are going through and improving sourcing. You're doing a great job with avoiding contemporary sourcing, thanks for continuing work on the article.

I had a few more tips (comments? notes.) My general view on assessing if a claim in a source can be trusted can be found at User:Rollinginhisgrave/How I understand reliable sources, but one tool you may find helpful to check if a claim could be true, is seeing if the source is mentioned at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (RSP) or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=&prefix=Wikipedia%3AReliable+sources%2FNoticeboard&fulltext=Search+the+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search|in the Reliable sources/Noticeboard archives].

If you do that, you will see that claims the New York Post makes generally can't be trusted. In [https://nypost.com/2024/05/07/lifestyle/heres-how-many-mcdonalds-there-are-in-the-world-and-the-countries-where-you-wont-find-one/ this article] in particular, the New York Post cites their source as Statista. RSP also comments on Statista, saying {{green|Statista aggregates statistical information from a number of sources, many of which are reliable. It is not the source of the statistics it displays, so should not be cited directly.}} So we should avoid making this claim if this is the only source, as we don't really know if it's true, unless we track down Statista's source. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 02:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)