Talk:Media of Canada

{{merged-from|Mass media in Canada|10 November 2024}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|

{{WikiProject Canada|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Media|importance=low}}

}}

To Whom it might concern:

I restored the Canadian literature link to See Also, because while literature does not fall under the definition of media (hence why it is not in the article), it is related. What's consider media, newspapers, magazines, television, other than communicating news and opinions also features fiction which is literature, they are all a form of medium.

I also restored the external links format because that's more organized and the one I see as standard on the site.

Also, would linking media pages of Canadian provinces and cities under See Also be proper, I'm still pondering that.

- Arsha Nos Mondelle

I removed the "See also Canadian literature" because I had included a link to Canadian literature in the body of the "Book and magazine publishing" section. It's only standard on Wikipedia to include a "See also" if a related link isn't already mentioned in the body of the article; if that link is already in there, then the "see also" is just redundant. Bearcat 23:35, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Error in authority

Current text: "While Canadian TV stations are technically required to identify themselves over the air by their call letters, the rule is rarely enforced by the CRTC."

The CRTC has nothing to do with call letters so there are no rules for them to enforce. Call letters, and most other technical aspects of broadcasting, are regulated by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. (Formerly Industry Canada, Formerly Department of Communications). See http://sms-sgs.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/sms-sgs-prod.nsf/eng/h_00015.html for information on ISED broadcasting services.