Talk:Melania Trump#rfc 421BEF3

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melania_Trump_(n%C3%A9e_Knavs)&redirect=no Melania Trump (née Knavs)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 29#Tiny Particle redirects}} until a consensus is reached. Plant🌱man (talk) 05:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Melania Trump|answered=yes}}

from:

She will also be an executive producer.

to:

She will also be an executive producer.{{cite news |last1=Masters |first1=Kim |author1-link=Kim Masters |title=The Courtship of Brett & Melania |url=https://puck.news/how-brett-ratner-wound-up-helming-amazons-40-million-melania-trump-documentary/ |access-date=10 May 2025 |work=Puck (media company) |date=11 February 2025 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20250215200509/https://puck.news/how-brett-ratner-wound-up-helming-amazons-40-million-melania-trump-documentary/ |archive-date=10 May 2025 |quote=Ratner appears to have been the first and only choice to direct the Melania film—though, in fairness, how many respected directors would want to make a documentary controlled by this particular subject?}}{{cite news |last1=Belloni |first1=Matthew |title=Melania Trump Documentary Scores Massive Amazon Payday |url=https://puck.news/melania-trump-documentary-scores-massive-amazon-payday/ |access-date=10 May 2025 |work=Puck (media company) |date=7 January 2025 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20250108011114/https://puck.news/melania-trump-documentary-scores-massive-amazon-payday/ |archive-date=10 May 2025}}

{{reftalk}}

69.181.17.113 (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

• {{not done for now}}: Wait until if and when it occurs. O3000, Ret. (talk) 18:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
• :@Objective3000, why are you suggesting waiting to add sources to an existing statement? If it is a WP:Crystal Ball problem, isn't the solution to delete the sentence not to avoid citing? meamemg (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
• ::Perhaps. I'm interested in opinions from other editors. O3000, Ret. (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
• :::Ok. I've gone ahead and added them for now. If someone has a reason why there shouldn't be sources, let me know. meamemg (talk) 16:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{done}} meamemg (talk) 16:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Melania Trump|answered=yes}}

The following is 1) not cited

2) not proven anywhere on the internet or in media

3) slandering the president of a country with no proof

4) misleading

This entire sentence needs to be deleted

She avoided the use of nannies, with a few exceptions in Barron's earliest years, insisting on raising him herself.[107]

'This decreased social activity meant that Donald began courting supermodels again, which made Melania uncomfortable.

According to biographer Mary Jordan, Melania did not know about the women who later alleged that they had extramarital affairs with him.[91] 100.43.112.18 (talk) 05:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Not done}} This text is adequately supported by ref 91. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I note that the article references that the holder of the role of FLOTUS is not an incumbent as it is not a political office. However, there are many officeholders on Wikipedia that do not hold necessarily an elective or political office, but are described as an INCUMBENT.

Furthermore, there is in fact an office of the First Lady.

Should this not be changed to incumbent, rather than current? The First Lady is a well-established and documented role as the wife to the President, in contrast to something like the spouse of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, which is more of a status than an incumbent office. Manruddy (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

I noticed that Mary Jordan's 2020 biography, The Art of Her Deal: The Untold Story of Melania Trump, was cited in support of an assertion about Melania Trump having renegotiated her prenuptial agreement with Trump in 2017. Looking around online, I found that Melania's spokesperson had dismissed the entire book as a work of fiction, so I edited the page to add that missing detail. I then realized that approximately 115 footnotes on this page--in other words, more than one-third of all its footnotes--cite The Art of Her Deal as a source. My questions are: Is this book a reliable source? If not, what needs to be done with the 115 or so footnotes that cite it? Too-Rye-Ay (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Melania Trump|answered=y}}

There are two instances of vandalism at the top of the page.

The first is an image of former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, with a caption that reads "melania loves trudea."

The second is a QR code below it that states "scan to hear the voice." 2601:243:C700:9F00:CD31:47B6:49A8:8332 (talk) 17:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:Already taken care of EvergreenFir (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

{{Edit semi-protected|Melania Trump|answered=yes}}

You need to remove false from the election fraud part it was found to be true and in 4 days I can change it myself Brittanybee1722 (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

:{{Not done}}: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:29, 2 July 2025 (UTC)