Talk:Memory of the World Programme#Consistency for the list articles

it seems that only two proposals per country are considered in each cycle

could we use more decisive language? are there sources that prove this so we could remove the seems? Kandersen102697 (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I removed "seems" and revised the whole paragraph. Unknown User, 13 January 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.152.187.162 (talk) 11:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

I am working on updating and improving the list articles of the Memory of the World international register. I'm keen to get community input on how these lists should be consistently styled. The articles I refer to are:

• Memory of the World Register – Africa
• Memory of the World Register – Arab States
• Memory of the World Register – Asia and the Pacific
• Memory of the World Register – Europe and North America
• Memory of the World Register – Latin America and the Caribbean
• Memory of the World Register – International Organizations

There are some gaps in location information that I am still working on, but there are differences in how locations are identified and even in font size. For instance I'm not sure if, in the "Location(s), Custodian(s)" column where we identify the location of the documentary heritage, we should have a wikilink for the institution and the city where it's located (e.g. National Archives of Egypt, Cairo), or just one wikilink. Should image galleries have their own heading, or are they part of the "List by country/territory" section? Any suggestions for improving this group of articles are welcome. MartinPoulter (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)