Talk:Mephedrone#Racemate.3F
{{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1date=21:26, 27 September 2010
|action1link=Talk:Mephedrone/GA1
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=387392802
|topic=Natural sciences
|action2 = GAR
|action2date = 13:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
|action2link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mephedrone/1
|action2result = kept
|action2oldid = 1256583341
|currentstatus = GA
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA|
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Chemicals|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs|importance=mid}}
}}
{{press|collapsed=yes
|title=Street of Shame
|org=Private Eye No. 1259, p. 6:
|date=2010-04-02
|url=
|author=
|quote=
Way back in January 2009, not long after mephedrone first began to be sold online, members of the web forum attached to the now-defunct "headshop" Champagne Legals discussed what brand name they might attach to the new product, which has the chemical identity dimethylmethcathinone or MM-Cat.}}
"What shall we call this drug? It's called MM-CAT, so why not Miaow?" suggested one. The name did not catch on ... But on 1 November 2009, someone did add the name "Meow" to the Wikipedia entry for Mephedrone at the head of a list of "street names."
Three weeks later ... the Sun declared the arrival of a "new party favourite called 'meow meow'" and the world went cat-call crazy.
Among a host of recent headlines the Sunday Times has reported on "the rise of Meow", the Times has heralded "Meow Meow arrests", the Sun shrieked about a "Harman snub for Meow Meow Ban" and the Daily Telegraph took a long hard look at the "Meow Meow Menace in Europe."
"No one ever called it Meow seriously till the papers picked up on the Wikipedia entry," one drugs expert tells the Eye.
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:Mephedrone/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{British English}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Mephedrone/Archive index|mask=Talk:Mephedrone/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=no}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
methylamine hydrochloride The anchor (#Production) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
}}
Conflicting source for serotonergic neurotoxicity
Hello, ive read the paper about the purported neurotoxicity to serotonergic neurons. Source 27 is included, which states that mephedrone likely has no serotonergic neurotoxic effects, even though the statement in the wikitext says it does.
I'd like someone more knowledgeable about Wiki to look to it. Thanks! NDElsga (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
I am concerned that this article does not meet the good article criteria because the "Pharmacology" section has had an "update needed" orange banner since 2015. Has this been resolved, and if not is anyone interested in fixing this up or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mephedrone/1}}
Russia
Various sources discussing use there: [https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Max-Daly-Patrick-Shortis-Breaking-Klad-Russias-dead-drop-drug-revolution-GI-TOC-November-2024.pdf] [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/14/russia-rise-of-powerful-darknet-drug-industry-dead-drops-punishment-beatings] [https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/russias-mephedrone-problem-is-spiralling-out-of-control/] [https://www.proekt.media/research/narkotiki-v-darknete/] (unsure on RS, but cited by [https://www-sciencedirect-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0955395922002067]) [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1745-9133.12647]. SmartSE (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)