Talk:Mercedes-AMG GT

Jaredclce, it's just a misunderstanding: both times are right, but the [http://www.mbusa.com/vcm/MB/DigitalAssets/AboutUs/PressReleases/US_%20Release_%202016_%20Mercedes_AMG_%20GT.pdf MB USA ones] you quoted are for the 0-60 mph, mine from the Daimler [http://media.daimler.com/dcmedia/0-921-1693303-1-1735000-1-0-0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1-0-0-0-0-0.html press release] are for the 0-100 km/h. However for an European car we'd better use the latter. – Cloverleaf II (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

: Oh, my bad -- I should have noticed that! I'm of the opinion we should use 0-60 mph, or at least mention it somewhere if you want to use the kph. Both work for me. Jaredclce (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

::I've checked out WP:AUTOCONV, seems 0-100 km/h is the preferred measurement. Now that we're at it, what's the best way to cite the reference for the whole table? – Cloverleaf II (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

:::Ok. I'm actually not sure about how to cite the reference for the whole table in the most effective way. I'll think about it though. Jaredclce (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Technically this is a true mid-engined sports car. Given its nimble handling and effectiveness on track, nobody who has driven the AMG GT (including the base model) would think this is a grand tourer. Oknevermind (talk) 06:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)