Talk:Military Cryptanalytics

I think it's worth merging them. That latter books are based on Friedman's work, and were done with Friedman's help, if I'm not mistaken. Not to knock Friedman's immense knowledge, mind you, but I think there's enough similarity for one article. Mmernex 13:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

:Friedman didn't help to any appreciable extent with the production of Callimahos' series, other than providing the original series from which Callimahos' was derived. To me it depends on whether it was intended that the Friedman-book article ever be expanded to say more than it currently does. As it stands, it could simply be redirected to the Callimahos-book article and the latter augmented with the Friedman book listings (ISBN etc.). The distinction between the two series needs to be kept clear, however. If, on the other hand, more was supposed to be said eventually about the Friedman book specifically, then I think it would be best maintained as a separate article. — DAGwyn 17:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military Cryptanalytics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527155252/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/military_cryptanalysis.shtml to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/military_cryptanalysis.shtml
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www2.cddc.vt.edu/www.eff.org/Activism/FOIA/Gilmore_v_NSA/summary_judgement.memo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)