Talk:Misnomer
{{oldafdfull|date= 30 December 2006 |result= keep |votepage= Misnomer (2nd nomination)}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Linguistics}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(100d)
| archive = Talk:Misnomer/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}}
{{archive box|April 2005–March 2008|age=100|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{MonthlyArchive
| root = Talk:Misnomer/Archives
| startyear = 2008
| monthformat = name
}}
Some other misnomers
Here are some other misnomers that should be included as examples:
- American “Indian”
- “planetary” nebula
- “rare earth” element
- “tidal” wave
Why there is no new examples without consensus?
I have attempted to make four edits on two topics: agriculture and geography. Two subtopics of these are buckwheat and North Sulawesi. Why these four edits have been reverted? Why there is now new examples without consensus? 2001:448A:11A3:1039:C13F:1A6A:78BB:F566 (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
:You ignored this hidden text that is clearly visible immediately adjacent to your edit: "BY CONSENSUS, THE NUMBER OF EXAMPLES IS LIMITED. DO NOT ADD NEW ITEMS WITHOUT CONSENSUS." I'm not sure why you think it doesn't apply to you. This is not a list article, so the examples cannot be endless. The few that are in the article now are good examples. There is a longstanding consensus that no new examples should be added to the article without a consensus to add a new example, and addition of a new example requires removing another example that is not as good as the new one. So you have three choices: Discuss any new example here and get a clear consensus to add it, or start a new article "List of misnomers", or stop trying to add new examples. Please abide by the consensus. Sundayclose (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
::Oh, I know. It has been while for a long why is the main reason there is no new examples without consensus. 2001:448A:11A3:1039:C13F:1A6A:78BB:F566 (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
:::You knew you weren't supposed to add new examples but you did it anyway??? Don't do it again. And I've already explained why there are no new examples: It's not a list article. Sundayclose (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The draft has already created
I create a list of misnomers, including graph in pencils is not actually created with graph and buckwheat is not closely related to wheat. Can anybody add more items in this list? 2001:448A:11A1:1A7E:6DA7:58EA:C3:B57E (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
talik20011 15 eptber
thislit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.119.233.214 (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Misnomers are Lies
Misnomers are lies. Intent or reason doesn't make it not a lie. Calling something what it is not, is a lie. 161.8.254.253 (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
French Fries
Why aren't French fries listed? GamerKlim9716 (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
:Because this is not a list article. It only needs a few good examples. And there is a consensus to not add new examples without consensus. Read the talk page archives. Sundayclose (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2025 (UTC)