Talk:Mueller report

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Politics |importance=High |American=yes |American-importance=High}}

{{WikiProject United States |importance=High |USGov=Yes |USGov-importance=Mid |USPresidents=y |USPresidents-importance=Mid |USPE=y |USPE-importance=High}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(90d)

| archive = Talk:Mueller report/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 4

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 5

}}

{{Old move

|date=August 6, 2020

|from=Mueller Report

|destination=Mueller report

|result=moved

|link=Special:Permalink/972785443#Requested move 6 August 2020

}}

__TOC__

Title

Yes, I know about OTHERTHINGS, but sometimes we should just use common sense.

Mueller report is not fully capitalized
Durham Report is

The latter makes sense. I suggest we do that here. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Senate Intelligence Committee Snippet

Why are we presenting the commentary from Heinrich, Feinstien, Wyden, Harris and Bennet as if its a conclusion from the entire Committee? Additionally, this inclusion would appear to violate WP:PRIMARY. It should be removed. MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

AI dashboard of the Mueller Report

I am a retired professor specializing in applied AI, and I've developed a system called Story Analyzer (see https://storyanalyzer.org/) which uses natural language processing and data visualization to produce dashboards of complex narrative text. Please check out this dashboard of the Mueller Report at https://storyanalyzer.org/muellerreport/.

I think this would be a useful addition to the article. Mikemitri (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:No, we cannot use your website as an external link. See WP:EL. MrOllie (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)