Talk:NBA Live 16

Does anyone think 2K fanboys will vandalize the Wikipedia page? I think so. It will happen only if NBA Live 16 gets better review scores than NBA 2K16, which has a 50-50 chance from happening. Don2datop (talk) 21:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

After reading this write-up about NBA Live 2016 I have a few suggestions on how to improve it. One way to improve this piece is to incorporate EA Sports in the development section of the article. As a reader it makes the cite seem more trustworthy if you use references to EA Sports as they are the ones who created the game. An example of this would be to say, " EA Sports describes their new league vs. league tournaments stating, "Work as a team and score as many points as possible to earn a win. Each member in the tournament will get to play 3 quarters. Select an opponent to play and score as many points as possible while playing good defense."

{{cite web|title=NBA LIVE MOBILE UPDATE DEV DIARY - DECEMBER 2016|url=https://www.easports.com/nba-live/news/2016/nba-live-mobile-december-update|website=EA Sports|accessdate=02/22}}

Another way to improve this piece is to incorporate more of the reviews in the section about reception. The reviews listed are very vague and don't give proper advice to the audience. After reading more into the IGN review the quote, "Sadly, the real problems with NBA Live 16 begin immediately after tip-off. To start, most players move identically to one another, with stiff, cartoony animations. It’s jarring to see such a good-looking character model move so poorly", as this quote captures the attention of the audience and attracts them to read more into the reviews. {{cite web|title=NBA Live 2016 Reviews|url=http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/10/06/nba-live-16-review|website=IGN|accessdate=02/22}}

{{reflist-talk}}