Talk:New York State Route 146

I'm the one who added the NY 156 reference in Altamont; thanks to TMF for his method as I had originally put up a noaccess tag, instead of the "To" banner. Now, for Schenectady: 146 doesn't link to 890 East; it's just a link to the Thruway, as the control of the highway once its ramp merges is within Thruway control. With that I don't think the "West" banner is needed at the next intersection as 890 can only go west from there. Signs in the area don't ever say East 890, and I can check on if there's a "To West" or just a "To" 890 at NY 7's intersection (Curry Road). Further, NY 146 does have a noaccess crossing over I-890 and I have to research whether it's between exits 6 and 7, and what the mile marker should be. Fwgoebel 02:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|+}} See above b (MoS): {{GAList/check|+}} See above notes.
3. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
4. :a (references): {{GAList/check|+}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|+}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|+}}
5. It is broad in its coverage.
6. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|+}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|+}}
7. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
8. :a (fair representation): {{GAList/check|+}} b (all significant views): {{GAList/check|+}}
9. It is stable.
10. :{{GAList/check|aye}}
11. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
12. :a (tagged and captioned): {{GAList/check|aye}} b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}}
13. Overall:
14. :a Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|+}}

:Well writen, and an interesting read. I quickly checked out about some stylistic concerns, but they seem to have been explained to me well. Pass. Maxim_(talk) 20:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)