Login
Login

Talk:New York State Route 321

{{ArticleHistory

|action1=GAN

|action1date=23:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=213358239

|action2=GTC

|action2date=13:45, 24 November 2008

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/New York State Route 20N

|action2result=promoted

|action2oldid=249826985

|ftname=New York State Route 20SY

|currentstatus=GA

|topic=transport

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|

{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|state=NY|type=SH|class=GA|importance=Mid|needs-jctint=no|needs-map=no}}

}}

GA review

{{#if:|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk||{{error:not substituted|GAList}}

}}}}

:GA review (see here for criteria)

{{#if:|

{{{overcom}}}|}}

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|???}}
  3. :: {{#if:The writing should be much better. Almost every sentence in the lead and the route description begins with "Route 32...". Also, the lead could be trimmed down a little bit, as right now it is equal to over a third of the total article size. Additionally, some of the links are redirects|The writing should be much better. Almost every sentence in the lead and the route description begins with "Route 32...". Also, the lead could be trimmed down a little bit, as right now it is equal to over a third of the total article size. Additionally, some of the links are redirects|}}
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  6. :: {{#if:Seems accurite, well sourced.|Seems accurite, well sourced.|}}
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  9. :: {{#if:Ditto.|Ditto.|}}
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  12. :: {{#if:Yep.|Yep.|}}
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  15. :: {{#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
  16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  18. :: {{#if:An image of the actual road would be nice, but it's fine.|An image of the actual road would be nice, but it's fine.|}}
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|}}
  21. :: {{#if:|{{{7com}}}|}}

Everything seems fine except for the writing, which still has a while to go before being considered good. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

:All done according my recent edits.Mitch32contribs 22:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was support merge. – TMF 18:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I support merging 931F into this article as it is a former alignment that is relatively short and can be completely described here. --Polaron | Talk 12:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I fully support the merge as well. Most of the route description on 931F is filler, and the histories of 321 and 931F are heavily intertwined. – TMF 22:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

If no one objects to the merge, I'll go ahead and perform it in the next few days. – TMF 13:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.