Talk:Nintendo#Date format

There have been several topics created requesting a controversies section, but none ever added. That makes me think this page deserves a WP:NPOV nomination for failing to do so, specifically failing WP:BALANCE?

These topics are related to discussing controversies in the past.

Talk:Nintendo/Archive 5

Talk:Nintendo/Archive 6#Controversies

https://kotaku.com/the-mess-that-came-after-nintendo-fired-an-employee-1771261927

https://www.polygon.com/24090415/nintendo-switch-controversies-debates

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60405561

https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-america-contractors-full-time-complaints-report

https://nintendo.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Nintendo_controversies

Of all of the above they're probably not all equally significant, but it seems odd that there is absolutely no mention of anything of the sort. I don't hold a grudge against Nintendo (admittedly I also don't know the behind-the-scenes of the company all that well), but it seems for objectivity there MUST be such a section.

I don't think there is any company of the size of Nintendo for which the Wikipedia page doesn't have a controversy and/or criticism section. Ybllaw (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

:For the record, while the other sites are fine, wikis hosted on Fandom are not reliable sources. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The Wii U isn't the worst selling video game console in Nintendo's history, it is actually the Virtual Boy, this is not mentioned at all on the page, neither is it mentioned even on the Virtual Boy's own Wikipedia page, instead, this Wikipedia page incorrectly says that "the Wii U is the least successful video game console in Nintendo's history".

The Wii U sold 13.56 million units worldwide, while the Virtual Boy sold 770,000 units.

Can someone please change this? 2A02:2F0A:B412:7300:80EB:BEF:5CEC:1C2F (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

For one Greenpeace constantly ranks electronic companies low from their environmental assessments despite efforts made by those companies to reduce their impacts. Similarly the Enough Project used a lack of information as an attack and thus gave Nintendo a score of 0. These come from old sources that have not been renewed with later rankings nor a corrected record on Nintendo's response to these inquiries that are over a decade old.

This gives the appearance of pure activism attacks and not actual credible efforts to create a true environmental assessment nor stance from Nintendo. Setery10 (talk) 21:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Nintendo|answered=Yes}}

Change percentage of Saudi Arabia stake in Nintendo, which is now at 6.3 percent. 188.65.191.61 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{done}}. Thank you! Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Big_N&redirect=no The Big N] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3#The two "Big N" redirects}} until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Nintendo|answered=y}}

Change the Number of Employees to 8,109, with the citation stating that “2,941 of the company's 8,109 employees are employed by Nintendo Co., Ltd. directly. The remaining 5,168 are employed by its subsidiaries.”

https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/en/outline/index.html DoctorLoki1 (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

:{{done}}, thanks. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}