Talk:Nonpoint source pollution

40px This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pdizaiy, Cmbrotherton. Peer reviewers: Cmbrotherton.

{{small|Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}

The info on forestry and logging's effects on pollution are oversimplified to the point of being inaccurate. They also lack any sources. Myself or someone else knowledgeable about timber harvesting, forest engineering and forest hydrology should correct and clarify when they have a chance.

Cfwschmidt (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

These two articles are about the same subject. They should be merged. Neelix (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

:Merge. Moreau1 (talk) 03:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

:Done --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

This term could reasonably be applied to air (and other types of) pollution as well. I've always understood it as air pollution rather than water pollution.

Also the definition is a bit unreasonable. There seem to be two reasonable definitions: 1) hard to control because it's coming from many places which in turn are under little control (cars for example), or 2) hard to figure out where it's coming from (runoff), but both these definitions aren't very good because they're extremely artificial... where does one draw the line between runoff from multiple farms and runoff from a single farm for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.202.1.20 (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree with that non-point source polluation refers to all types of pollution: green, blue and brown. The big question is where to draw the line between localized and non-point source pollution. I would venture to say that it is a sliding scale and non-point source pollution is more of a catch phrase than an unambigious scientific term.

Gideon Kruseman

Environmental economist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gideon.kruseman (talk • contribs) 09:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

:No references have been provided that document the use of "nonpoint source" terminology for air pollution. The NOAA reference currently in the article does not associate the term with air pollution. Area source is commonly used to describe this air pollution concept, at least in the US (e.g., Clean Air Act). Moreau1 (talk) 03:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nonpoint source pollution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/330.pdf
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/484.pdf
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/590.pdf
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/standards/595.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227134003/http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/csp/ to http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/csp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Where is nonpoint source pollution most prevalent? Maofukada (talk) 16:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

I came to this article while working on water pollution. I have made some improvements today, for example I expanded the lead to become a better summary. Also, I have removed some of the focus on the United States and moved that content to a "country examples" section. - I'd like to suggest that the article be refocused on just water pollution. The air pollution content (which is currently just a few sentences) could be moved to a new article called Nonpoint source pollution (air) - if that is even needed; it could just be included in air pollution. Another option would be to add a hatnote to say that "this article is about water pollution; for nonpoint source air pollution see air pollution.". At present it's confusing because the lead talks about air pollution but the main body of the article does not. EMsmile (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

50px This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Indiana University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Category:Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Spring{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}

{{small|The above message was substituted from {{tlc|WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)}}

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Wayne_State_University/Urban_Pollution_and_Remediation_(Winter) | assignments = ClimateGuardian, Trey.Timban | reviewers = Jessicasabatini, Djfocus24 | start_date = 2024-01-09 | end_date = 2024-04-30 }}

— Assignment last updated by Tshaible (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)