Talk:Operation Dwarka

{{Article history

|action1=AFD

|action1date=21 November 2005

|action1link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Dwarka

|action1result=kept

|otd1date=2014-09-08|otd1oldid=624631619|otd2date=2021-09-07|otd2oldid=1042499302

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|Indian-task-force=yes|Pakistani=yes|B-Class-1=yes|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo=old(90d)

| archive=Talk:Operation Dwarka/Archive %(counter)d

| counter=1

| maxarchivesize=75K

| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadsleft=4

| minthreadstoarchive=1

}}

Changing Pakistan claims

{{u|Hagennos}} Please discuss your edits here. You have changed the wording in some of text which was clearly stated as Pakistani claims to stating them as facts. Now those sentences itself required citation to be there by changing the wording you are also changing the meaning of the sentence. Please explain yourself here and maintain WP:STATUSQUO. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

::{{ping|Adamgerber80}} How do you think the meaning was changed. See the edits here

::Original Text

::It was aimed at luring the heavy ships anchored in Bombay into attacking the Pakistani ships. The intention was that the submarine PNS Ghazi lurking in the Arabian Sea would then engage and sink the Indian ships.

::Changed Text

::It was aimed at luring the heavy ships anchored in Bombay into attacking the Pakistani shipsto enable the submarine PNS Ghazi lurking in the Arabian Sea to engage and sink the Indian ships.

::When you already have the statement "It was aimed at luring " then why should we have another sentence starting with "The intention was"

::Changed Text

::As per Pakistani sources, the objective to divert the Indian Air Force from attacking Pakistan's southern front worked as the Indian Air Force raids on the city of Karachi ceased, presumed to be due to lack of availability of the radar guidance, which was damaged in the attack.

::Original Text

::As per Pakistani sources, objective to divert the Indian Air Force attacking Pakistan's southern front worked as the Indian Air Force raids on the city of Karachi ceased, presumed by Pakistani sources to be due to lack of availability of the radar guidance to the IAF fighter jets, which was damaged according to Pakistani claims in the attack

::When we already have the statement starting with "As per Pakistani sources" then why we need to keep emphasizing it three times in a same sentence? --Hagennos^Talk 19:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

::: {{u|Hagennos}} Okay. I am going to self revert but split out that sentence since since it is too long and convoluted that in my view it conveys that as the neutral stance. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)