Talk:Origin of Hangul

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{WikiProject Korea |importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Writing systems |importance=mid}}

}}

{{archives}}

{{archive basics|counter=2}}

Removal/additional flagging of non-cited assertions, mostly regarding 'Phags-pa theory'?

Most material (latter 75 percent) in the Phags-pa theory section here is unsourced. The non-cited material regarding the 'Phags-pa theory' is also spilling out to other non-'Phags-pa theory' sections, which additionally harms the other parts of the article too. Most unsourced material has been flagged years ago. Daldidandal (talk) 13:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

:Everything is sourced. You're free to add 'cn' for statements that you think should be individually cited. — kwami (talk) 23:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

::Don't remove it! Hangul origin in MONGOLOID 100% confirmed!, as is from Mongolia. Sejong copied Hangul from Mongol Seal Script (蒙古篆字) Hangul is not derived from Chinese characters. ""Our ancestors already knew that Hangul was related to the Mongolian alphabet. In the 'Complete Character Examples' of Seo-seok Yu-hui's 'Story of Korean Characters' (1824, 'Mun-tong', Volume 19 of 100 Volumes)." "Hangul researchers from all over the world deeply agreed and paid tribute to the research."

::Source:https://www.budreview.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=2148 Boodgme (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

:::'copied' is putting it too strongly. the basic consonant glyphs come from phagspa, and through that tibetan, but not the vowels, and not the derivation of the other consonants. or the organization, which is chinese — kwami (talk) 00:12, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::::Source of hangul is the 訓民正音 (Hunminjeongeum), writen in Chinese!, you can read it here:

::::https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:조선어학회_훈민정음.pdf/3 User:Baboure (talk) 02:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::::The consonant arrangement order of Hunminjeongeum, Phags-pa, and Tibetan characters is the same.

::::https://whoami555.tistory.com/13742912?category=1134937 https://whoami555.tistory.com/13742994 Libereat (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::Noting that Boodgme, Babourel, and Libereat were all blocked for sockpuppeting. I'd be ok if the recent addition about the hoax was deleted. It's sourced to a local newspaper anyway; not exactly a scholarly work. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:::deleted. [we should only give air to hoaxes if they're already notable.] — kwami (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)