Talk:PREDA Foundation

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines|importance=Low}}

}}

{{find}}

Headline text

ive just started this page on Preda, ill develop it over the next few days. This article is about a Charity, not a business. ive seadchec around wikipedia and theres are hundreds of articles about different charities around the world so I thought it would be good to add this charity. Ill add all citations, resources, etc as i complete the article, thankyouSusanbryce 16:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, Im still building the article, but I feel ive already put together the foundation of a good solid article here on this charity. Ive made sure to put high quality citations for the article, I added the Preda official homepage in the external links. ive listed the goals of the charity, its history, information on its founders, a number of charitable projects Preda is involved with, and its awards.

If I could get some feedback from others it would be much appreciated, kind regards.Susanbryce 17:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Susan,

You have made a good start. It is a well referenced report. If you could find a few more sources, that would be good but it is a good article. Capitalistroadster 23:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

This article was nominated for speedy deletion as spam. The article is well referenced and does not meet the criterion for speedy deletion. If the nominator still wishes to seek the deletion of the article, it should be through Articles for Deletion. Capitalistroadster 23:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou Capitalistroadster for your input, much appreciated, regardsSusanbryce 13:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Concerns relating to our [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] and [[WP:BLP|living persons]] policies

I had to remove what was an obvious and slanderous attack from this page. People need to follow the rules of wikipedia and refrain from personal slanderous attacksSusanbryce 13:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

sorry susan. i think you need to look up the definition of slander. slander is not true. accusing me of being a vandal would be a good example of slander. removing documented facts from the article is not. my true statement is supported by facts. if you are going to list a person's history here i dont see any reason why it should only include the good things they have done and not include the bad things. this is about facts. not advertising.RodentofDeath 08:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

:If someone has been accused of a crime and later all the charges were dismissed, it isn't acceptable to merely say they were charged or accused, we must give balanced coverage in accordance with our policies on neutrality and living persons. Addhoc 09:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

ok, adhoc. i have no problem with that as long as it is done consistently. considering the extremely low numbers of convictions then i will assume that the article on wikipedia titled "human trafficking in angeles city" will likewise be deleted.

Shouldn't it be PREDA, allcaps?

If the name means People’s Recovery Empowerment Development Assistance, shouldn't it PREDA Foundation instead of Preda Foundation? / edgarde 01:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

:Good point. I'll try to move this article and then create the needed redirect.DONE!!! --- Tito Pao 01:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Creator deserves an article?

Does anybody agree that an article should be made for Fr. Shay Cullen, if he made the group and was nominated for a nobel peace prize three times? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.43.200 (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)