Talk:Periodic Videos

{{dyktalk|29 July|2010|entry=... that The Periodic Table of Videos, hosted by Martyn Poliakoff, is one of the most popular sets of chemistry videos on YouTube?}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

}}

Note to Prof Poliakoff #1

Hi Prof Poliakoff,

I want to note that your recent video ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yT8kvHlgeg]) suggests most published PT's are "WRONG". I want to oppose this. For sure, the Wikipedia PT's published over here are consistent & correct. I pose, and you may oppose — but then do so!

Let me tell you that on internet, no one EVER writes in capitals, unless you want to abuse someone.

But my point is: Always, always use the 32-column periodic table. The 32-column Periodic Table would have shown & solved your current problems circa 1978. Had you used the Seaborg PT_(32-column). -DePiep (talk)

=Note #2=

Oh dear. Just saw the new vid about the IUPAC confirmation of four elements. You still use the 18-col PT, which is a shame to the teaching world. Also, that 18-col PT has the statement that group 3 = 32 elements (Sc, Y and 15+15 Ln, An). Well, that is a pre-Seaborg (1939?) suggestion. I sugget you keep all old PT's in the museum, and start using the 32-column PT as a mature and modern form. Best wishes, -DePiep (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Oops

{{ping|Anne drew Andrew and Drew}} - it looks like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Periodic_Videos&diff=819121792&oldid=819034296 your latest edit] inadvertently duplicated the page content. I'd revert, but I imagine you're probably trying to unmangle it yourself. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 16:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

:Aha not sure what happened there. Thanks for the heads-up! AdA&D 16:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)