Login
Login

Talk:Project Veritas

{{FAQ|collapsed=no|quickedit=no}}

{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap}}

{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ab|brief}}

{{talk page header}}

{{Round in circles|search=no}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Organizations |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|American=yes|American-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Hudson=yes|Hudson-importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Media |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Skepticism |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Alternative Views |importance=Low}}

}}

{{annual readership |expanded=|scale=log}}

{{connected contributor (paid)|User1=Sal at PV|U1-client=Project Veritas|U1-employer=Project Veritas}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 8

|minthreadsleft = 1

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(21d)

|archive = Talk:Project Veritas/Archive %(counter)d

}}

__TOC__

Project Vertias referenced for helping the EPA to discover $20B in "wasted funds"

Should a summary of this story be listed in the Notable Incidents section?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/epa-administrator-zeldin-demands-return-20b-taxpayer-money-wasted-biden-administration EnSingHemm (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:no: WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS soibangla (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

::Washington Post has since reported on it as well

::https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/02/12/lee-zeldin-epa-climate-funding/ EnSingHemm (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:::It's common knowledge that the new administration thinks any funds related to climate change are "wasted". But I don't see a good reason to include this here. O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Planned Parenthood videos - why?

Greetings: I am wondering why PV made videos attempting to somehow entrap Planned Parenthood employees. The paragraph on the incident is not clear on that point. What were they hoping to "expose"? There was no illegality involved on the agency's part that I can see. Thank you for your help, Wordreader (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:The attempt was to create the impression that PP was advising people to violate laws. I believe the result was damage to PP funding. If we can find WP:RS for this, it might be a useful addition. I think the current text does show the attempts to sully reputation. 18:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)O3000, Ret. (talk) O3000, Ret. (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)